期刊文献+

《白象似的群山》理想认知模式解读

The Analysis of Hills Like White Elephants from the Perspective of Identified Cognitive Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 海明威的"冰山理论"在其作品《白象似的群山》中得到充分体现,虽然因在其结尾留下悬念而更吸引人,但也令读者在解读小说本身时颇有难度。首先总结《白象似的群山》的研究现状,分析相关文章的写作特点,并在此基础之上,提出理想认知模式理论对分析该文学作品的适切性。依据Lakoff的理想认知模式理论,从其中的原型理论,凸显图形背景理论,体验互动和联想激活的认知方式及男女主角的认知心理模式角度对其进行解读。试图探索一条分析文学作品的新途径。 Iceberg theory created by Hemingway has been embodied completely in his works,Hills Like White Elephants,its suspense ending has not only attracted readers,but also make the text itself hard to understand.Firstly,the paper summarized the current situation of research for Hills Like White Elephants,then analyzed the writing styles of relative papers,and make a point that it is suitable for the theory of identified cognitive model to analyze the literate text on the basis of above.According to Idealized Cognitive Models theory of Lakoff,this paper analyzed the text from levels of prototype theory,Figure Ground theory,the cognitive means of Body-based Meaning Interaction and Association Activation and the cognitive psychological model of hero and heroine.Furthermore,try to search a brand new way for analyzing literate text.
作者 章丽丽
机构地区 长沙理工大学
出处 《河北理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第6期219-221,共3页 Journal of Hebei Polytechnic University:Social Science Edition
关键词 理想认知模式 原型 图形背景 体验互动 联想激活 identified cognitive model prototype figure & ground body-based meaning & interaction association & activation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1艾险峰.含意理论与文学作品解读──兼析《白象似的群山》[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),1999,13(3):52-57. 被引量:6
  • 2马建军.两性话语交际的滞碍——《白象似的群山》对话分析[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2002,13(4):24-27. 被引量:16
  • 3池青.海明威研究中的“象征主义”问题[J].湖南大众传媒职业技术学院学报,2006,6(4):102-104. 被引量:10
  • 4Lakoff G.1987. Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind[M] .Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 5Barwise J. 1989. The situation in logic[A] .CSLI lecture note series[C].
  • 6Fox B. 1986. Local patterns and general principles in cognitive processes: anaphora in written and conversational English[J]. TEXT 6.
  • 7Xiong Xueliang (熊学亮) 1998. First person zero anaphor as a cognilive unit in Chinese[J]. WORD vol.49, No 3:383-403.
  • 8Ariel M. 1994. Interpreting anaphoric expressions: a cognitive versus a pragmatic approach[J]. Journal of Linguistics, 30:3-42.
  • 9Croft William. 1991. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: the cognitive organization information[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 10Tai James (戴浩一)1984. Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler's four categories [ A ] .Parasession on Lexical Semantics [ C]. Chicago Linguistic Society, pp 289-96.

共引文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部