期刊文献+

庭审提问的顺应性研究

下载PDF
导出
摘要 参照Verschueren的语言顺应理论,可探讨机构权力和动机等语境因素对庭审提问中语言选择的动态顺应关系。通过描述语言选择的动态过程,解释和说明庭审提问这一互动言语现象的复杂性及其所实现的各种功能,并描述整个法庭提问特别是中国法庭提问的运作过程,对民事纠纷的解决和刑事案件的审判具有一定的实践意义。
作者 胡海娟
出处 《华南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期154-158,共5页 Journal of South China Normal University:Social Science Edition
基金 教育部社科基金重大项目"基于语料库的法律语篇信息分布与语言实现研究"(06JJD740006)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1胡海娟.法庭话语研究综论[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2004,15(1):8-11. 被引量:18
  • 2WIJ W P. Cross - Cultural Communication in the Legal Field. The Hong Kong Linguist, 1998(18) : 1 -7.
  • 3MATOESIAN G. The Grammaticalization of Participant Roles in the Constitution of Expert Identity. Language in Society, 1999 (28) :491 - 521.
  • 4MATOESIAN G. Intertextual Authority in Reported Speech: Production Media in the Kennedy Smith Rape Trial. Journal of Pragmatics, 2000(32) : 879 -914.
  • 5LUCHJENBROERS J. In Your Own Words: Questions and Answers in a Supreme Court Trial. Journal of Pragmatics, 1997 (27) : 477 - 503.
  • 6CONLEY J, O'BARR W. Just Words : Law, Language, and Power. The University of Chicago Press, 1998 : 15 - 38.
  • 7EHRLICH S. Communities of Practice, Gender, and the Representation of Sexual Assault. Language in Society, 1999(28) :239 -256.
  • 8EADES D. I Don' t Think It' s an Answer to the Question: Silencing Aboriginal Witnesses in Court. Language in Society, 2000(29) : 161 - 195.
  • 9ILIE C. What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive and Argumentative Acts. Sweden: Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, 1994 : 172 - 215.
  • 10何自然,于国栋.《语用学的理解》-Verschueren的新作评介[J].现代外语,1999,22(4):429-435. 被引量:313

二级参考文献15

  • 1孙建荣.Principles of Pragmatics——By Geoffrey. N. Leech, Longman, 1983, Pp. xii, 250, ISBN O 582 55110 2.[J].外国语,1985,8(1):80-81. 被引量:23
  • 2姜同玲.律师辩护词的修辞功能初探[J].广东外语外贸大学学报,2002,13(3):12-17. 被引量:6
  • 3[2]Drew,P.1990.Strategies in the Contest between Lawyer and Witness in Cross-examination.Language in the Judicial Process[M]. New York:Plenum Press. 39-64.
  • 4[3]Drew,P.1985."Analyzing the use of language in courtroom interaction"[A].In Van Dijk,T.(Ed.).Handbook of Discourse Analysis: Discourse and Dialogue Vol. 3[C]. London: Academic Press.
  • 5[4]Eades,D.2000. J don't think it's an answer to the question: Silencing aboriginal witnesses in court[J]. Language in Society, Vol.29, 161-195.
  • 6[5]Ehrlich,S.1999."Communities of practice,gender, and the representation of sexual assault"[J].Language in Society, 28, 239-256.
  • 7[6]Ilie,C.1994.What Else Can I Tell You? A Pragmatic Study of English Rhetorical Questions as Discursive andArgumentativeActs[M].Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 8[7]Levi,J.& Walker,A.1990. Language in the Judicial Process[M].New York: Plenum Press.
  • 9[8]Luchjenbroers,J.1997."In your own words...': Questions and answers in a supreme court trial"[J]. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol,27,477-503.
  • 10[9]Matoesian,G.M.1993. Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

共引文献331

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部