期刊文献+

基于系统观的组织高层管理团队异质性分析

An Analysis of Heterogeneity of Top Management Team Based on System Viewpoint
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在研究高层管理团队异质性和冲突理论的基础上,结合系统观点与五行理论提出团队五要素模型假说,解释异质性研究中理论与实证背离的原因,并对异质性和冲突理论的不足进行补充。 On the study of heterogeneity and conflict theory of top management team,a five-factor model hypothesis with systems perspective and the five elements theory has been built in this thesis,to interpret the deviation between theoretical analysis and empirical study of TMT heterogeneity and conflict theory.It is a complement of heterogeneity and conflict theory.
作者 张韶光 陈进
出处 《科技管理研究》 北大核心 2010年第20期137-140,共4页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 教育部人文社科项目"基于期权视角的高管团队定价模型研究"(07JA630070) 上海市教委科研创新项目"基于期权视角的技术管理型人力资本定价模型研究"(09YS231)
关键词 高层管理团队 系统 五行 五要素模型假说 top management team system five elements theory five-factor model hypothesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1HAMBRICK D C, MASON P A. Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9 (2): 193-206.
  • 2TIHANYI L, et al. Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification - J ]. Journal of Management, 2001, 26 (6) : 1157 -1177.
  • 3FINKELSTEIN S, HAMBRICK D C. Strategic leadership: Top exec- utives and their effect on organizations [ M ]. s. l. : South - Western College Pub, 1996.
  • 4RICHARD H L, MAIER N R. Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups [ J ]. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1961, 62 ( 2 ) : 401 - 407.
  • 5MARCH J G, SIMON H A. Organizations [ M ]. New York: Wiley, 1958.
  • 6PRIEM R L W, DOUGLAS L, GREGORY G. D. Inherent Limitations of Demographic Proxies in Top Management Team Heterogeneity Research [J]. Journal of Management, 1999, 25 (6) : 935 -953.
  • 7魏刚.高级管理层激励与上市公司经营绩效[J].经济研究,2000,35(3):32-39. 被引量:1647
  • 8JEHN K A. Enhancing effectiveness: an investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value - based intragroup conflict [ J ]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1994, 5 (3) : 223 -238.
  • 9AMASON A C, SCHWEIGER D M. Resolving the paradox of conflict: Strategic decision making and organizational performance [ J ]. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1994, 5 (3): 239 -253.
  • 10DREU C K W DE, WEINGART L R. Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance [ J ]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 88 (4) : 741 - 749.

二级参考文献55

  • 1李美枝.《从有关公平判断的研究结果看中国人之人己关系》[J].《本土心理学研究》创刊号(台湾大学心理学系本土心理学研究室编辑出版),1993,:267-343.
  • 2陈立.白虎通疏证[M].北京:中华书局,1994..
  • 3Knight, D., C.L.Pearce, K.G.Smith, J.D.Olian, H.P.Sims, K.A.Smith, P.Flood. Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(3): 445-465
  • 4Carpenter, M.A.. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(3): 275-284
  • 5Zenger, T., B.Lawrence. Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure on communication. Academy of Management Journal, 1989, 32:353-376
  • 6Pfeffer,J.. Organizational demography. In: L.L.Cummings and B.M.Staw (eds.). Research in organization behavior. Greenwich: JAI Press, 1983, 5:299-357
  • 7Amason,A.C., H.J.Sapienza. The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 1997, 23(4): 495-516
  • 8Elron,E.. Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity. Leadership quarterly, 1997, 8(4): 393-412
  • 9Allison P.. Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review, 1978, 43:865-880
  • 10Hambrick,D.C., P.A.Mason. Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206

共引文献1750

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部