期刊文献+

一种基于图示模型的冲突分析方法研究 被引量:1

Using Graph Model to Analyze Conflict Problems
下载PDF
导出
摘要 探讨冲突分析技术的理论框架,在此基础上提出一种基于图示模型的冲突分析方法。决策者从当前局势出发,依据相关决策规则,实施局势转移,分析实际可达到局势以及冲突均衡,并重点关注实现均衡目标相应的最短途径。模型适用于决策者轮流协商、交替决策的冲突事件。并给出一个水资源冲突问题的研究实例。 In this paper,the framework of the traditional technique is introduced and one graph model for conflict resolution is proposed.It is suggested that,starting from the initial state,decision-makers will transit conflict state according to conflict rules and predict the reachable states and available equilibrium,as well as the least-cost transition path.All players are designed to negotiate and make decisions alternatively.Finally,one case study of water resources conflict problem is carried out.
作者 赵微
出处 《科技管理研究》 北大核心 2010年第20期231-233,248,共4页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 水资源与水电工程科学国家重点实验室开放研究基金项目"多元利益主体的区域水资源系统配置模式研究"(2008B045)
关键词 冲突分析 图示模型 局势 均衡 途径 决策 conflict analysis graph model state equilibrium path decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1ROBBINSSP.组织行为学精要[M].郑晓明,译.北京:电子工业出版社,2002.
  • 2FANG L, HIPEL K W, KILGOUR D M. Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution [ M ]. New York, USA: Wiley, 1993.
  • 3HOWARD N. The Present and Future of Metagame Analysis [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1987, 32 ( 1 ) : 1 -25.
  • 4蔡建峰,梁工谦,王艳平.从亚对策到软对策的发展评述[J].西北工业大学学报(社会科学版),2001,21(2):12-14. 被引量:2
  • 5FRASER N M, HIPEL K W. Solving Complex Conflicts [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1979, 9 (12) : 805-816.
  • 6LI K W, KILGOUR D M, HIPEL K W. Status quo analysis of the Flathead River conflict [ J ]. Water Resources Research, 2004, 40 (5) : W05S03.
  • 7LI K W, KILGOUR D M, HIPEL K W. Status quo analysis in the graph model for conflict resolution [ J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2005, 56 (6) : 699 - 707.
  • 8曾勇,杨志峰.官厅水库跨区域水质改善政策的冲突分析[J].水科学进展,2004,15(1):40-44. 被引量:19
  • 9张永军,曾维华,路娴,李菲菲.三维图示模型在流域水资源地域冲突分析中的应用[J].水利学报,2005,36(8):966-971. 被引量:8

二级参考文献17

  • 1吴育华,程德文.冲突分析的三维模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,1995,15(8):30-36. 被引量:8
  • 2北京市水利科学研究所 等.官厅水库流域水质改善总体技术方案研究项目总报告[R].,2002.2-3.
  • 3[7]Bryant J.. A Matrix of Paradoxes, Cooperation or Conrlict, 1996:10(6), 3
  • 4[1]L.C. THomas. Games, Theory and application. Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester, 1984:129-150
  • 5[2]C. bM. Benjamin, C. A. Powell. The Use of Metagame Analyses as a Diagnostic Tech-nique in Deciseon Situations: the 1988 U.S.-U. S. S. R. Grain Negotiations,In-formation and Decision Technologies, 1990: 16 (4),361-372
  • 6[3]N. Howard. The Present and Future of Metagame Analysis. European Journal of Operational research, 1987(32),1-25
  • 7[4]N. Howard. Soft Game Theory. Infomation and Decision Technologies, 1990:16(3) ,215-227
  • 8[5]N. Howard. Drama Theory and Its Relation to Game Theory. partl: Dramatic Resolution vs. Rational Solution. Group Decision and Negotiation, 1994: (3), 187-206
  • 9[6]N. Howard. Drama Theory and Its Relation to Game Theory. part 2: Formal Model of the resolution Process.Group Decision and Negotiation, 1994:(3) ,207-235
  • 10李清,徐志军,汪应洛.图们江经济区贸易发展生产要素推动阶段的冲突分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,1997,17(5):60-66. 被引量:3

共引文献23

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部