期刊文献+

决策中的外部性与群体博弈分析 被引量:1

The Externality in Decision Making and Group Game Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 阐述决策外部性的性质,建立不确定信息群体博弈模型、不完全信息群体博弈模型和群体合作博弈模型,并结合实际的案例分析对模型进行分析。认为,外部效用是群体共同选择接受的激励机制,群体规模是正外部性发挥的保证;信息在群体博弈中具有重要的价值,掌握更对的信息可以避免错误的选择,并使正外部性得到更好的发挥;合作博弈凡是发挥外部应用的最好方式。通过外部性的视对给现实经济生活中的新产品扩散、企业间的默契、企业集群和企业联盟等群体博弈行为予以解释和应用分析。 This paper has firstly discussed the nature of decision-making externality,then followed by setting up the group gaming model under uncertain information and incomplete information,as well as the cooperative group gaming model.Then this paper also provides some case studies to explain these models in detail.And conclusions drawn are as follows: First,external effectiveness is the group co-opt incentive mechanism,and the group size plays a guarantee role for it.Second,the information in the group game has important values,and gasping more information can avoid the wrong choice,and make positive externalities play better.Furthermore,the cooperative game is the best way to make full use of the externality.In this way,from the view of externality,this paper gives an explanation and applies analysis to the proliferation of new products,tacit agreement among enterprises,enterprise clusters and business alliances in the real economic life by group game theory.
出处 《科技管理研究》 北大核心 2010年第20期234-237,241,共5页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 自然科学基金项目"面向突发危机事件的应急群决策支持及实证研究"(70671066) 博士点基金项目"恐慌心理和行为传播与控制的理论与实验研究"(20070248054)
关键词 外部性 群体博弈 不确定信息 不完全信息 externality group game theory uncertain information incomplete information
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1CIALDINI R B. Influence: Science and Practice [ M]. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2001.
  • 2FINGER L, SCHACHTER S, BACK K. Social Pressures in Informal Groups [M]. New York: Harper. Asch, 1950.
  • 3MILGRAM S. Obedience to Authority [ M ]. New York : Harper and Row. 1969.
  • 4OLIVER P E, MARWELL G. The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of Critical Mass I J]. American Sociological Review, 1988, 53 : 1 - 18.
  • 5OLIVER P E, MARWELL G A. Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91:522-56.
  • 6GIGERENZER G, TODD P M. ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart [ M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • 7BIKHCHANDANI S, HIRSHLEIFER D, WELCH I. Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades [ J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives 1998, 12:151 -70.
  • 8GOLDSTEIN D G, GIGERENZER G. Models of Ecological Rationality: The Recognition Heuristic [ J ]. Psychological Review, 2002, 109:75 -90.
  • 9GRANOVETYER M S. Threshold Models of Collective Behavior [ J ]. American Journal of Sociology, 1978, 83 : 1420 -43.
  • 10SALGANIK M J, DODDS P S, WAITTS D J. Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market [ J ].Science, 2006, 311:854-6.

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部