期刊文献+

宫颈环形电切除术在治疗宫颈上皮内瘤样变中的诊治价值 被引量:7

The value of LEEP in diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨宫颈环形电切除术(LEEP术)在宫颈上皮内瘤样病变(CIN)中的诊治价值。方法:分析106例经阴道镜宫颈活检诊断为CIN的患者行LEEP宫颈锥切手术治疗,观察手术时间和出血量、比较术前与术后病理检查结果,术后切缘累及,并发症及宫颈修复情况。结果:LEEP治疗CIN平均手术时间3~l6min,术中出血量5-20ml,阴道镜下宫颈活检的CIN与LEEP术后标本的病理诊断CIN符合率74.53%,术后级别上升5.66%,下降19.81%;术后切缘累及共5例,占总病例数的4.72%;术后并发症发生率为3.8%;宫颈修复率为90.57%。结论:LEEP术是诊断和治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变安全、有效的方法。 Objective:To study the effectiveness of Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in the diagnosis and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Methods:One hundred and six cases with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosed by biopsy were treated by LEEP.Observe the operative time and bleeding volume,cervical biopsy results before and after LEEP were evaluated,margin specimens,complications and the effects and cervical regeneration were followed up.Results:The mean operative time of LEEP was 3-16 minutes.The mean bleeding volume was 5-20ml.Pathological diagnosis of CIN after LEEP accuracy74.53% by colposcopy.The pathological grade went up 5.66%,while grade went down 19.81%.Margin specimens were involved in 5 cases (4.72%).Incidence rate of postoperative syndrome is 3.8%;The cervical rehabilitation rate is 90.57%.Conclusion:LEEP is one of the effective and safe methods for the diagnosis and treatment of CIN.
作者 刘锦钰
出处 《安徽卫生职业技术学院学报》 2010年第5期32-33,共2页 Journal of Anhui Health Vocational & Technical College
关键词 宫颈环形电切除术(LEEP) 宫颈上皮内瘤变 阴道镜 Loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP) Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia colposcopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

  • 1杨伶俐,孙红,陈蔚.宫颈刮片及阴道镜检查在妇科普查中的意义[J].上海预防医学,2004,16(7):351-352. 被引量:13
  • 2余晓,俎德学,夏建妹.电子阴道镜对宫颈病变的诊断价值探讨[J].临床医学,2005,25(7):43-45. 被引量:7
  • 3石少权,苏兆娟,郭天棋,王峰.阴道镜下活检与宫颈锥切术后病检诊断宫颈上皮内瘤样病变[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2005,19(12):872-873. 被引量:19
  • 4毕蕙,廉玉茹,李克敏.CINⅡ~ⅢLEEP治疗后随访情况分析[J].实用妇产科杂志,2006,22(1):37-39. 被引量:97
  • 5Sarian LO, Derchain SF, Andrade LA, et al. HPV DNA test and Pap smear in detection of residual and recurrent disease following loop electrosurgical excision procedure of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol, 2004,94 : 181-186.
  • 6Numnum TM, Kirby To, Leath CA 3rd, et al. A prospective evaluation of "see and treat" in women with HSIL . Pap smear results : is this an appropriate strategy? J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2005,9:2-6.
  • 7Livasy CA, Maygarden SJ, Rajaratnam CT, et al. Predictors of recurrent dysplasia after a cervical loop electrocautery excision procedure for CIN-3: a study of margin, endocervical gland, and quadrant involvement . Mod Pathol, 1999,12 : 233-238.
  • 8Reich O, Pickel H, Lahousen M, et al. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ: long-term outcome after cold-knife conization with clear margins. Obstet Gynecol, 2001,97:428-430.
  • 9Kang SB, Roh JW, Kim JW, et al. A comparison of the therapeutic efficacies of large loop excision of transformation zone and hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ.Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2001,11:387-391.
  • 10Corona Gutierrez CM, Tinoco A, Navarro T, et al. Therapeutic vaccination with MVAE2 can eliminate precancerous lesions associated with infection by oncogenic human papillomavims. Human Gene Ther, 2004, 15:421-431.

共引文献95

同被引文献59

引证文献7

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部