期刊文献+

超声声像变化评价乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效 被引量:4

Ultrasonographic changes evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究超声显像在乳腺癌新辅助化疗前后疗效评价的价值。方法以外科手术切除的乳腺癌组织病理学疗效评价为依据分组,对新辅助化疗前后乳腺癌超声显像行回顾性对比和分析。结果(1)新辅助化疗后乳腺癌瘤体多数缩小或消失。(2)组织病理学疗效评价:按照既往评价系统分,治疗反应轻度者19例,中度47例,重度12例。(3)新辅助化疗后超声显像变化:周边高回声晕显示率均增加,轻度(P<0.05)和中度(P<0.01)治疗反应组有统计学差异;边缘毛刺征显示率均减少,中度(P<0.01)治疗反应组有统计学差异;腋窝转移淋巴结显示减少,中度(P<0.01)和重度(P<0.05)治疗反应组有统计学差异;PDI检测血供明显减少,中度(P<0.01)和重度(P<0.05)治疗反应组有统计学差异。结论超声显像可成为手术前乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效评估的实用性技术。 Objective To investigate the ultrasonographic changes of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods Ultrasonographie changes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer were compared according to the response to neoadjuvant therapy of pathological evaluation. Results 1. The sizes of cancer became smaller or disappear mostly after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. 2. The response to neoadjuvant therapy operated in breast cancer were mild in 19 cases, moderate in 47 cases and severe in 12 cases by the common grading system. 3. Ultrasonographic changes before and after the neoad- juvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: All of the showing rate with surrounding hyperechoic halo increased ( P 〈 0.05 in mild cases and P 〈0.01 in moderate cases) ; All of the showing rate with spicular signs decreased, ( P 〈0.01 in moderate cases) ; All of the showing rate with lymphadenectasis decreased, (P 〈 0.01 in moderate cases and P 〈0.05 in severe cases) ; All of the blood flow in tumor detected by PDI dropped ( P 〈 0.01 in moderate cases and P 〈 0.05 in severe cases). Conclusions To compared with uhrasonographic changes before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a useful technique to evaluate response of breast cancer.
出处 《中国肿瘤外科杂志》 CAS 2010年第5期267-270,共4页 Chinese Journal of Surgical Oncology
基金 江苏省科技厅自然科学基金项目(BK2009447) 江苏省卫生厅课题(H201029)
关键词 超声显像变化 乳腺癌 新辅助化疗 疗效评估 uhrasonographic changes breast cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kurosumi M.Significance of histopathological evaluation in primary therapy for breast cancer--recent trends in primary modality with pathological complete response(pCR) as endpoint[J].Breast Cancer,2004,11(2):139-147.
  • 2谭旭艳,吴丹,高志刚,张婷.超声引导自动活检术在乳腺癌术前病理诊断的价值[J].江苏医药,2009,35(1):12-13. 被引量:9
  • 3Ogston KN,Miller ID,Payne S,et al.A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy:prognostic significance and survival[J].Breast,2003,12(5):320-327.
  • 4Abrial C,Van Praagh I,Delva R,et al.Pathological and clinical response of a primary chemotherapy regimen combining vinorelbine,epirubicin,and paclitaxel as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with operable breast cancer[J].Oncologist,2005,10(4):242-249.
  • 5Christopher A,Garces MD,William G,et al.Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer[J].Am Surg,2004,70(7):565-568.
  • 6谭旭艳,吴丹,高志刚.乳腺浸润性导管癌超声声像与分子免疫学指标检测相关性探讨[J].中国肿瘤外科杂志,2010,2(3):142-145. 被引量:2
  • 7Roubidoux MA,LeCarpentier GL,Fowlkes JB,et al.Sonographic evaluation of early-stage breast cancers that undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J].J Ultrasound Med,2005,24(7):885-895.
  • 8彭玉兰.乳腺超声图谱[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.80-81.
  • 9Kuerer HM,Newman LA,Buzdar AU,et al.Residual metastatic axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer[J].Am J Surg,1998,176(6):502-509.
  • 10Huber S,Medl M,Helbich T,et al.Locally advanced breast carcinoma:computer assisted semiquantitative analysis of color Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy(work in progress)[J].J Ultrasound Med,2000,19(9):601-607.

二级参考文献19

  • 1郭燕丽,李锐,华兴,郭爱民.三维血管能量成像在乳腺肿块中的应用[J].临床超声医学杂志,2001,3(S1):90-90. 被引量:9
  • 2江泽飞,徐兵河,宋三泰,孙燕.乳腺癌内分泌治疗的基本共识[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(3):238-239. 被引量:48
  • 3丰乃奇,王淑敏,杨敬英,王建华.实时三维超声检查对早期乳腺癌浸润范围的初步研究[J].内蒙古医学杂志,2006,38(9):780-781. 被引量:2
  • 4何敬海,秦玲,陈东风,刘阿庆,安霞,王少春,曹长军,韩友东.乳腺浸润性导管癌的超声诊断特征[J].济宁医学院学报,2006,29(4):23-24. 被引量:2
  • 5Coates AS, Keshaviah A, Thurlimann B, et al. Five years of letrozole eompared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast eaneer: update of study BIG1-98 [J]. J Clin Oneol, 2007,25(5) :486-492.
  • 6Jordan VC. Tamoxifen: a most unlikely pioneering medicine [J]. Nat Rev Drug Diseov,2003,2(3):205-213.
  • 7Badoual A, Maruanic C, Ghorra, et al. Pathological prognos tic factors of invasive breast carcinoma in ultrasound-guided large core biopsies-correlation with subsequent surgical excisions[J]. The Breast, 2005,14 (1) : 22-27.
  • 8Baqai T, Shousha S. Oestrogen receptor negativity as a marker for highgrade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast[J]. Histopathology, 2003,42(5) : 440-447.
  • 9Harris L,Fritsche H,Mennel R,et al.American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(33):5287-5312.
  • 10Baqai T,Shousha S.Oestrogen receptor negativity as a marker for high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast[J].Histopathology,2003,42(5):440-447.

共引文献30

同被引文献68

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部