2Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Chose KA, et al. Acute flank pain: comparison of noncontrast-enhanced CT an excretory urography. Radiology, 1995 ; 194:789.
3Kennedy TC, Miller Y, Prindiville S. Screening for lung canner revised and the rols of Sputumn Cytoloty and Fluorescence Bronchoscopyin High-group . Chest ,2000,117:72.
4Manser RL, Irving LB, DE Campo, et al. Ovenview of observation studies of low-dose helcal computed tomography screening for lung canner. Respirology,2005,10:97.
5Mayo TR, Hartman TE, Lee KS, et al. CT of the Chest : Minimal Tub Required for Good Image Quality with the least Radiotion dose. A JR, 1995,164:603.
6Mulkens TH, Daineffe S, De Wijnqaert R, et al. Urinary Stone Disease:Comparison of Standard-Dose and Low-Dose with 4D MDCT Tube Current Modulation. A JR,2007,188:553.
7Katz SI, Saluja S, Brink JA, et al. Dose associated with unenhaneed CT for suspected renal colic : impact of repetitive studies. AJR ,2006, 186:1120.
9Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B. Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol, 1998,159:673.
6Smith RC,Rosenfield AT,Choe KA,et al.Acute flank pain:comparison of noncontrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography.Radiology,1995,194(3):789-794.
7Spielmann AL,Heneghan JP,Lee LJ,et al Decreaseing the radiation dose for renal stone CT:a feasibility study of single and multi-detector CT.AJR Am J Roentgenol,2002,178(5):1058-1062.
8Joan P,Keith A,Richard A,et al.Helical CT for Nephrolithiasis and Ureterolithiasis:Comparison of Conventional and Reduced Radiation-Dose Techniques.Radiology,2003,229(2):575-580.
9Liu W,Esler SJ,Kenny BJ,et al.Low-dose nonenhanced helical CT of renal colic:assessment of ureteric stone detection and measurement of effective dose equivalent.Radiology,2000,215(1):51-54.
10Diel J,Perlmutter S,Venkataramanan N,et al.Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic:an effective technique for radiation dose reduction?J Comput Assist Tomogr,2000,24(5):795-801.
4Mayo JR, Hartman TE, 1 ee KS, et al. CT of the chest : minimal tube current required for good image quaIity with the least ra- diation dose [ J ]. A JR, 1995,3 (164) :607 - 803.
5. Bong Soo Kim, Im Kyung Hwang, Yo Won Ciloi, et al. Low - Dose and Standard - Dose Unenhanced Helical Computed Tomography for the Assessment of Acute Renal Colic: Pro- spective Comparative Study [ J]. Acta Radiologica, 2005, 7 (46) :756 -763.
6Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K, et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and world wide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources [ J]. Radiology, 2(253) :520 - 531.
7Alkadhi H . Radiation dose of cardiac CT what is the evi- dence? [J]. EurRadiol, 2009,6(19):1 311-1 315.
8Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Schmid FT, et al. Low kilovolt- agecardiae dual- source CT: attenuation, noise, and radia- tion close [J. EurRadiol, 2008, 9(18):1 809-1 817.
9Paul JF, Abada HT . Strategies for reduction of radiation- close in cardiac muhislice CT [ J. Eur Radiol, 2007, 8 (17) :2 028 -2 037.
10Hatem Alkadhi, Sebastian Leschka. Radiation dose of cardi- ac computed tomography - what hasbeen achieved and what needs to be done [ J l- European Radiology,2011,3 ( 21 ) : 505 - 509.
