摘要
反垄断法的实施包括公共实施和私人实施,公共实施的主要途径是执法机关的执法,私人实施的主要途径是私人诉讼。于是就产生了如何使这两种实施机制结合,实现优势互补的问题,这一问题从诉讼进程的角度看可分为三点:诉讼启动与执法程序的关系问题,两种程序竞合时哪种程序应中止的问题,以及行政执法的终局决定对民事判决是否具有拘束力的问题。对这些问题应以反垄断法的观念来思考,而不应以民法和行政法的观念来思考。
The implementation of the anti-monopoly law includes public implementation and private implementation. The former mainly depends on the enforcement of law enforcement agencies, and the latter on the private litigation. As a result, the issue referring to how to make these two enforcement mechanisms be complementary comes into being. From the angle of litigation process, the issue can be divided into three parts, namely the relationship between starting proceedings and enforcement procedures, the suspension at the concurrence of two procedures, and the restriction of final decision of administrative enforcement on the civil judgments. These problems should be considered through the notion of anti-monopoly law instead of the notion of civil law and administrative law.
出处
《上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2010年第5期26-33,共8页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金
上海市教育委员会科研创新项目:<反垄断法的观念基础与解释方法>(项目编号:08ZS37)
关键词
反垄断法
公共实施
私人实施
结点
anti-monopoly law
public implementation
private implementation
node