摘要
本文对国外服务贸易壁垒三种不同测量方法——频度测量法、价差测量法、量差测量法进行了介绍和比较,最终选择了最适合的频度测量法,并且参照了Dihel和Shepherd(2007)的测量模型,结合我国相关法律法规的条文以及我国入世时对证券业的承诺,计算了我国证券业的开放程度,发现现阶段我国证券业的开放程度还是比较低的。但是相比于2001年我国刚加入WTO时的情况,我国证券业的开放还是比较明显的。
In this paper,three methods of the measurement of the openness of trade in services are introduced; they are frequency measurement,price-based measurement and quantity-based measurement. With reference to Dihel and Shepherd＇s （2007） model and the relevant regulations in China,this paper calculated the degree of openness of China＇s portfolio market through frequency measurement method. The result shows that the openness relatively low. However,the progress in China＇s opening up its portfolio market is signifi cant when compared with the situation in 2001.
关键词
证券服务贸易
频度测量法
自由度测量
trade in portfolio services
frequency measurement
measurement on the degree of openness
