期刊文献+

轻比重左旋布比卡因腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在高龄患者下肢手术中的应用 被引量:1

Application of Combined Spinal-epidural Anesthesia with Hypobaric Levobupivacaine in Elderly Patients with Lower Extremity Operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨低比重左旋布比卡因腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在高龄患者下肢手术中的临床效果及可行性。方法选择拟行下肢手术的高龄患者60例,年龄75~93岁,ASAⅡ~Ⅲ级,体质量42~76Kg,随机分为两组,每组30例。LB组蛛网膜下腔给予0.2%轻比重左旋布比卡因3mL,B组蛛网膜下腔给予0.2%轻比重布比卡因3mL。监测麻醉前、麻醉中及麻醉后BP、HR、SpO2的变化,测定感觉阻滞平面及下肢运动阻滞效果,观察麻醉效果及不良反应。结果两组感觉及运动阻滞程度无明显差异,两组麻醉效果均满意,B组不良反应发生率高于LB组。结论轻比重左旋布比卡因腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉用于高龄下肢手术效果满意。 Objective To explore the effect and feasibility of spinal-epidural anesthesia with hypobaric levobupivacaine in elderly patients with lower extremity operation. Methods 60 patients who scheduled for lower extremity operation, aged from 75 to 93 years old, ASA Ⅱ-Ⅲ, body weight 42~76 kg, were randomly assigned to two groups with 30 cases each. Patients in group LB and B were respectively given 0.2% hypobaric levobupivacaine and bupivacaine 3 ml in subarachnoid cavity. BP,HR and SpO2 were monitored before, during and after the anesthesia. The following items were recorded: level of sensory block, degree of motor block, anesthetic effect and adverse effects. Result There was no signif icant differences in sensory and motor block between 2 groups. Both groups showed satisfactory anesthetic effect. The rate of adverse effects in group B was higher than that of group LB. Conclusions Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with hypobaric Levobupivacaine was safe and suff icient in elderly patients with lower extremity operation.
出处 《中国医药指南》 2010年第30期22-23,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 轻比重左旋布比卡因 腰麻—硬膜外联合麻醉 高龄患者 下肢手术 Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia Hypobaric Levobupivacaine Elderly patients Lower extremity operation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献21

  • 1曹灵敏,李胜德,马桂芬,景卫.腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉在高龄患者的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2004,20(12):742-742. 被引量:236
  • 2陈国振,陈传义,张志辉,李刚,何柱良,陈杰,龚琰.股骨头置换术老年病人轻比重布比卡因单侧连续腰麻的可行性[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(5):338-341. 被引量:58
  • 3徐桂茹,贾方,桂晓臣,张晓奕,孙翠翠.0·15%罗比卡因轻比重腰-硬联合麻醉用于侧卧位下肢骨科手术的可行性[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2006,22(7):518-519. 被引量:19
  • 4Eyres RR, Chalkiadis GA, Austin S. Efficacy and safety of caudal injection of levobupivacaine, 0.25%, in children under 2 years of age undergoing inguinal hernia repair, circumcision or orchidopexy. Paediatr Anaesth, 2003,13:114-121.
  • 5Morrison SG, Dominguez JJ, Frascarolo P, et al. A comparison of the electrocardiographic cardiotoxic effects of racemic bupivacaine, levobupivacaire, and ropivacaine in anesthetized swine. Anesth Analg, 2000, 90:1308-1314.
  • 6Ladd LA, Chang DH, Wilson KA, et al. Effects of CNS site-directed carotid arterial infusions of bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine in sheep. Anesthesiology, 2002,97: 418-428.
  • 7Chang DHT, Ladd LA, Wilson KA, et al. Tolerability of large-dose intravenous levobupivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg,2000,91:671-679.
  • 8Stewart J, Kellett N, Castro D. The central nervous system and cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in healthy volunteers.Anesth Analg, 2003,97: 412-416.
  • 9Kopacz DJ, Allen HW, Thompson GE. A comparison of epidural levobupivacaine 0.75% with racemic bupivacaine for lower abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg,2000,90:642-648.
  • 10Bader AM, Tsen LC, Camann WR, et al. Clinical effects and maternal and fetal plasma concentrations of 0.5 % epidural levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology, 1999,90:1596-1601.

共引文献253

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部