期刊文献+

单独持续输注瑞芬太尼用于经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术清醒镇静的可行性探讨 被引量:7

Feasibility study of continuous remifentanil infusion alone for conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究单独持续输注瑞芬太尼用于经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)清醒镇静的临床效果和安全性。方法选择49例美国麻醉医师协会Ⅰ~Ⅲ级、年龄39~88岁、在清醒镇静下行ERCP的患者,首先以0.2μg.kg-1.min-1速率持续输注瑞芬太尼5分钟,手术开始后减为0.15μg.kg-1.min-1,未合用其他麻醉药物。观察两组患者麻醉前(T0)、手术开始(T1)、手术开始后5分钟(T2)、手术开始后10分钟(T3)和术毕(T4)时平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、呼吸频率(RR)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、脑电双频指数(BIS)以及术后改良Aldrete镇静评分、操作者满意度评分和不良反应发生情况,并记录手术操作时间和麻醉时间。结果与麻醉诱导前基础值T0比较,患者T1、T2、T3和T4时MAP无明显变化;T3、T4时HR均明显升高(P<0.01);T4时SpO2值明显降低(P<0.05);T1、T2、T3和T4时BIS值均明显降低(P<0.01)。所有患者均顺利完成操作,操作过程中有3例患者SpO2降至90%以下,无患者需要面罩辅助通气或气管插管。4例患者在插入十二指肠镜时发生恶心,3例患者在取石操作过程中出现轻微疼痛感,但均可忍受,疼痛评分未超过3分。4例患者对镜干入口和取石操作无记忆,10例患者对镜干入口有记忆,35例患者对两者均有记忆。4例患者在术毕镜干取出时处于睡眠状态,其余患者在术毕时均处于清醒状态;16例患者术后发生恶心、呕吐;操作者满意度评分为97.1±4.2。结论单独持续输注瑞芬太尼用于ERCP实施清醒镇静可获得满意的麻醉效果,且安全性好。 Objective To study the clinical efficacy and safety of remifentanil infusion alone for conscious sedation during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography(ERCP).Methods 49 patients in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ,aged 39-88 years old,scheduled for ERCP were infused continuously at a rate of 0.2 μg·kg^-1·min^-1 for 5 min before operation,and decreased to 0.15 μg·kg-1·min-1 after operation,the other drugs were not given.Mean artery pressure(MAP),heart rate(HR),respiratory rate(RR),O2-saturation(SpO2),bispectral index(BIS) were recorded before anesthetic induction(T0),at beginning of operation(T1),5 min after operation(T2),10 min after operation(T3)and at end of operation(T4).The Modified Aldrete scores,operator satisfaction scores and side effects were observed after operation,in operation and anesthesia were also recorded.Results As compared with preinduction values,MAP at T2 and T3 were significantly higher,HR at T1,T2,T3 and T4 were significantly higher,SpO2 values at T3,T4 were significantly lower,BIS at T1,T2,T3 and T4 were significantly lower.Uncontrolled agitation and movement during sedation did not occur in either group.SpO2 of 〈90% was observed in three patients,no intubation and face mask ventilation were required.During insertion of duodenoscopy,nausea occurred in four patients,three patients felt slight pain during stone extraction action.Four patients showed forgetfulness to insertion of duodenoscopy and stone extraction action,10 patients remembered the insertion of duodenoscopy,35 patients showed forgetfulness to the above two procedures.Four patients were asleep at the end of operation,the rest patients were awake.The operator satisfaction scores were 97.1±4.2.Conclusion The continuous remifentanil infusion alone for conscious sedation during ERCP showed satisfactory anesthesia effect and safe.
出处 《临床荟萃》 CAS 2010年第22期1963-1966,共4页 Clinical Focus
关键词 胰胆管造影术 内窥镜逆行 瑞芬太尼 清醒镇静 cholangiopancreatography endoscopic retrograde remifentanil consicous sedation
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Faigel DO, Baron TH, Goldstein JL, et al. Guidelines for the use of deep sedation and anesthesia for GI endoscopy[J]. Gastrointest Endosc,2002,56(5) :613-617.
  • 2American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists [J]. Anesthesiology, 2002,96 (4) : 1004-1017.
  • 3Raymondos K, Panning B, Baehem I, et al. Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreat ography under conscious sedation and general anesthesia [J]. Endoscopy,2002,34(9):721-726.
  • 4Manolaraki M, Theodoropoulou A, Stroumpos C, et al. Remifentanil compared with midazolam and pethidine sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study [J]. Dig Dis Sci,2008,53(1) :34-40.
  • 5Akcaboy ZN, Akeahoy EY, Albayrak D, et al. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2006,50(6) :736-741.
  • 6Moerman AT, Foubert LA, Herregods LL, et al. Propofol versus remifentanil for monitored anaesthesia care during colonoscopy[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003,20 (6) : 461-466.
  • 7Bouvet L, Allaouchiche B, Duflo F, et al. Remifentanil is an effective alternative to propofol for patient-controlled analgesia during digestive endoscopic procedures[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2004,51(2) :122-125.
  • 8Lauwers M, Camu F, Breivik H, et al. The safety and effectiveness of remifentanil as an adjunct sedative for regional anesthesia[J]. Anesth Analg,1999,88(1) :134-140.
  • 9Medina H J, Galvln EM, Direkx M, et al. Remifentanil as a single drug for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a comparison of infusion doses in terms of analgesic potency and side effects[J]. Anesth Analg,2005,101(2):365-370.
  • 10Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus EP, et al. Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoseopy[J]. Am J Gastroenterol,2000,95(6) :1476-1479.

同被引文献58

  • 1杨敬芳,王悦,李继红.重症监护患者感染病原菌的分布特征及预防策略[J].河北医科大学学报,2009,30(10):1045-1048. 被引量:4
  • 2程平瑞,江伟航,董静毅,黄芳,黄雁,梁健华.纤维支气管镜清醒插管时不同剂量瑞芬太尼复合咪达唑仑的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(6):493-495. 被引量:23
  • 3Heesen M, Klohr S, Hofmann T, et al. Maternal and foetal effects of remifentanit for general anaesthesia in parturients un- dergoing caesarean section A systematic review and meta-analy- sis [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2013,57(1) :29-36.
  • 4Ryu JH, Lee SW, Lee JH, et al. Randomized double-blind study of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine for flexible bronchos- copy [J]. Br J Anaesth,2012,108(3) :503-511.
  • 5Clouzeau B, Bui HN, Guilhon E, et al. Fiberoptic bronchosco- py under noninvasive ventilation and propofol target-controlled infusion in hypoxemic patients [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2011,37 (12) : 1969-1975.
  • 6Greco M, Landoni G, Biondi-Zoccai G, et al. Remifentanil in cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth,2012,26(1) :110-116.
  • 7Mousa WF. Effect of hypereapnia on pleth variability index dur- ing stable propofol: Remifentanil anesthesia [J]. Saudi J An- aesth,2013,7(3) : 234-237.
  • 8Schwarz GL, Volmanen P, Albrechtsen S, et al. Remifentanil target-controlled infusion during second stage labour in high-risk parturients: A case series [J]. Acta AnaesthesioI Scand, 2013, 57(6) :802-808.
  • 9Stefanutto TB, Feiner J, Krombach J, et al. Hemoglobin desat- uration after propofol/remifentanil-lnduced apnea: A study of the recovery of spontaneous ventilation in healthy volunteers [J]. Anesth Analg,2012,114(5) :980-986.
  • 10Quintard H, Pavlakovie I, Mantz J, et al. Adjunctive remifen- tanil infusion in deeply sedated and paralyzed icu patients during fiberoptic bronchoscopy procedure: A prospectlve, randomized, controJled study [J]. Ann Intensive Care,2012,2(1) ;29.

引证文献7

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部