摘要
为探讨LG2000型肛肠病治疗仪治疗肛肠病的临床疗效,本研究对比分析采用LG2000型肛肠病治疗仪治疗(治疗组)和常规手术治疗(对照组)的肛肠病患者疗效。结果显示,与对照组相比,治疗组手术时间短,创面愈合快,术中出血少,术后尿潴留、创缘水肿、假性愈合等并发症发生率低,且差异均有统计学意义,P〈0.01。术中及术后Ⅱ、Ⅲ级疼痛、复发以及术后疗效方面,两组差异均无统计学意义,P〉0.05。结果表明,LG2000型肛肠病治疗仪治疗肛肠病总疗效优于常规手术治疗,值得临床推广应用。
The objective of the study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of LG2000 therapeutic instrument for anorectal diseases(TIAD) in the treatment of anorectal diseases(ARD). The 180 patients with ARD underwent two different surgical procedures:procedure with TIAD(the study group) and the routine surgical treatment(the control group). As results,the operative time was shorter,the wound healing was quicker,the intraoperative bleeding was less and the postoperative complications(urine retention,edge edema,false healing,etc. ) were less in study group compared with the control group( P〈0.01) ,while the intraoperative and postoperative pain( Ⅱ and Ⅲ grades), recurrence and therapeutic efficacy were of no statistical difference between the two groups( P 〉0.05). It is concluded that LG2000 TIAD is better in general therapeutic efficacy than that of routine surgical treatment.
出处
《中国肛肠病杂志》
2010年第10期32-34,共3页
Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词
肛肠病
肛肠痫治疗仪
疗效
Anorectal disease
Therapeutic instrument for anorectal diseases
Therapeutic efficacy