期刊文献+

意识提高活动在外语语法教学中的运用——基于中国英语学生的实证研究 被引量:4

The Application of Consciousness-Raising Activity to Foreign Language Grammar Teaching——An Experimental Study on Chinese EFL Learners
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文通过教学实验探讨意识提高活动在外语语法教学中的促进作用。笔者提出了两个研究问题:(1)演绎法与归纳法相比,哪种方法更有助于学习者对所教语法现象的理解和运用?(2)不同的教学方法与所学知识保持时间的长短是否存在相互作用?课堂上对两个实验组分别进行演绎法和归纳法教学,对照组采用传统的教学,教学结束后的第四天进行第一次测试,4周和10周后又分别做了两次跟踪测验。调查结果表明:两种教学法在帮助学习者对所教语法现象的理解和运用方面可以起到相同的作用;不同语法教学方法和所学语法知识保持的时间存在相互关系,在演绎法和归纳法中运用意识提高活动的效果均优于传统法。本研究的启示是:提高语法意识任务在外语教学中不失为一种行之有效的方法。 This paper explores the facilitative effects of consciousness-raising activity on foreign language grammar teaching.The study addresses the following two issues:(a) which method helps learners more to understand the phenomenon and the use of the target structures,deduction or induction?(b) Whether the interaction exists between different teaching methods and the length of time to maintain their learning of the target features? In the classroom the C-R deductive and inductive tasks are respectively applied to two experimental groups while traditional instruction to a control group.An immediate posttest was conducted four days following the teaching.Four weeks and ten weeks later two delayed posttests were administered respectively.Results show that:(a) both deduction and induction can play the same role in helping learners to understand and use the target features;(b) an interaction exists between a particular instruction type and the length of time to maintain their subsequent learning of the target features and students who received C-R deductive and inductive instruction outperformed those exposed to traditional instruction.The study suggests that grammar C-R tasks can be recommended as useful pedagogy to the fi eld of language teaching.
作者 李丽娟
出处 《北京第二外国语学院学报》 2010年第10期66-72,共7页 Journal of Beijing International Studies University
关键词 语法教学 意识提高活动 演绎法与归纳法 中国英语学生 grammar instruction C-R activity deduction & induction Chinese EFL learners
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Chu-tai H. Lee & Chaochang Wang. The Effects of Teaching a Difficult Grammatical Feature of English through Grammar Instruction and a Communicative Approach [ J ] . Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 2002, ( 28 ) /2 : 175-192.
  • 2Doughty, C. & Williams, J. Pedagogical Choices in Focus on Form [ A] . In C. Doughty & J. Williams ( eds. ) . Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [ C ] . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998:197- 262.
  • 3Ellis, R. The Structural Syllabus and Second Language Acquisition [ J ] . TESOL Quarterly, 1993, ( 27 ) : 91-113.
  • 4Ellis, R. Understanding Second Language Acquisition[ M ] . Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, 1999.
  • 5Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Long, Michael H. An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition Research [ M ] . New York: Longman Inc. ,1991.
  • 6Mohamed, N. Consciousness-raising Tasks: a Learner Perspective [ J ] . ELT Journal, 2004, ( 58 ) /3 : 228-233.
  • 7Radwan, Adel Abu. The Effectiveness of Explicit Attention to Form in Language Learning [ J ] . System, 2005, ( 3 ) : 69-87.
  • 8Rosemary, R. The Effects of Deductive and Inductive Instruction on the Acquisition of Direct Object Pronouns in French as a Second Language [ J ] .Modern Language Journal, 2003, ( 87 ) /2 : 242-258.
  • 9Rutherford, W. & M. Sharwood-Smith. Consciousness- raising and Universal Grammar [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1985, (6) /3 : 274-282.
  • 10Schmidt, R. The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1990, ( 11 ) : 129-154.

二级参考文献44

  • 1戴曼纯.广义左向合并理论-来自附加语的证据[J].现代外语,2002,25(2):120-141. 被引量:46
  • 2田金平.试论外语交际自发能力的培养[J].山西师大学报(社会科学版),2004,31(4):141-144. 被引量:6
  • 3McLaughlin, Barry.Theories of Second Language Learning Edward Arnold,1987.
  • 4Bialystok, Ellen.On the Relationship between Knowing and Using Linguistic Forms. Applied Linguistics,1982, Vol. 3.
  • 5DeKeyser, R M 1997. Beyond explicit rule learning:Automatizing second language morphosyntax [ J ].Studies in Second Language Acquisition 19: 195-221.
  • 6Doughty, C 1991. Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of second language relativization [J]. Studies in Secoud Language Acquisition 13/4 : 431-469.
  • 7Doughty, C & J Williams. 1998. Pedagogical choices in focus on form [A]. In C Doughty & J Williams (eds.). Focus on Form in Classroom Second LanguageAcquisition[C]. Cambridge: CUP. pp. 197- 261.
  • 8Ellis, R 1984. Can syntax be taught? A study of the effects of formal instruction on the acquisition of WH questions by children [J]. Applied Linguistics 5. 138-155.
  • 9Ellis, N 1994. Introduction: Implicit and explicit language learning: An overview [A]. In N. Ellis (ed.). Implicit and Excplicit Learning of Languages[C]. London: Academic Press. pp. 1-31.
  • 10Krashen, S 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications [M]. London: Longman.

共引文献96

同被引文献49

引证文献4

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部