期刊文献+

Assessment of Comparative Genomic Hybridization Experiment by an in situ Synthesized CombiMatrix Microarray with Yersinia pestis Vaccine Strain EV76 DNA 被引量:1

Assessment of Comparative Genomic Hybridization Experiment by an in situ Synthesized CombiMatrix Microarray with Yersinia pestis Vaccine Strain EV76 DNA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective The quality of microarray data influences the accuracy of comparative genomic analyses to a large extent.To ensure that the results obtained by using an in situ synthesized microarray are accurate,data quality is to be assessed by evaluating the melting temperature (Tm) of probes,probability of false synthesis rates,and fragmentation of labeled targets.Methods DNA from the Yersinia pestis vaccine strain EV76 was used for microarray analyses.Microarray results were confirmed by PCR.Statistical and bioinformatics methods were employed to perform microarray data analyses and evaluation.Results Correlation coefficients of the three datasets were above 0.95 after two-time stripping and hybridization with a labeled DNA with the size of fragmentation being 200 bp-2 kb,which showed that the hybridization results were highly reproducible.Correlation coefficients were lower with the values ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 between the datasets generated from hybridization with different sizes of the labeled DNA fragment.For the relationship between Tm and signal intensity,there was a different distribution of Tm in the lowest 300 or 3 000 probes with a range of 70 ℃-72 ℃ and the highest 300 or 3 000 probes with a range of 72 ℃-74 ℃.Conclusion The results of this study suggest that the initial microarray design may affect the accuracy of final analyses and that the probe Tm and the size of the labeled fragment may be the two factors of the greatest importance. Objective The quality of microarray data influences the accuracy of comparative genomic analyses to a large extent.To ensure that the results obtained by using an in situ synthesized microarray are accurate,data quality is to be assessed by evaluating the melting temperature (Tm) of probes,probability of false synthesis rates,and fragmentation of labeled targets.Methods DNA from the Yersinia pestis vaccine strain EV76 was used for microarray analyses.Microarray results were confirmed by PCR.Statistical and bioinformatics methods were employed to perform microarray data analyses and evaluation.Results Correlation coefficients of the three datasets were above 0.95 after two-time stripping and hybridization with a labeled DNA with the size of fragmentation being 200 bp-2 kb,which showed that the hybridization results were highly reproducible.Correlation coefficients were lower with the values ranging from 0.87 to 0.92 between the datasets generated from hybridization with different sizes of the labeled DNA fragment.For the relationship between Tm and signal intensity,there was a different distribution of Tm in the lowest 300 or 3 000 probes with a range of 70 ℃-72 ℃ and the highest 300 or 3 000 probes with a range of 72 ℃-74 ℃.Conclusion The results of this study suggest that the initial microarray design may affect the accuracy of final analyses and that the probe Tm and the size of the labeled fragment may be the two factors of the greatest importance.
出处 《Biomedical and Environmental Sciences》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2010年第5期384-390,共7页 生物医学与环境科学(英文版)
基金 supported by a grant from the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(863 Program,No. 2006AA2Z4A7)
关键词 Array CGH Data quality ASSESSMENT Array CGH Data quality Assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Wilkes T, Laux H, Foy C A (2007). Microarray data quality - review of current developments. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 11(1), 1-13.
  • 2Eads B, Cash A, Bogart K, Costello J, et al. (2006). Troubleshooting microarray hybridizations. Methods in Enzymology 411, 34-49.
  • 3Copois V, Bibeau F, Bascoul-Mollevi C, et al. (2007). Impact of RNA degradation on gene expression profiles: assessment of different methods to reliably determine RNA quality. Journal of Biotechnology 127(4), 549-559.
  • 4Archer K J, Dumur C I, Joel S E, et al. (2006). Assessing quality of hybridized RNA in Affymetrix GeneChip experiments using mixed-effects models. Biostatistics 7(2),198-212.
  • 5Jones L, Goldstein D R, Hughes G, et al. (2006). Assessment of the relationship between pre-chip and post-chip quality measures for Affymetrix GeneChip expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 211.
  • 6Reimer M, Weinstein J N (2005). Quality assessment of rnicroarrays: visualization of spatial artifacts and quantitation ofregional biases. BMC Bioinformatics 6,166.
  • 7Li Y, Dai E, Cui Y, et al. (2008). Different region analysis for genotyping Yersinia pestis isolates from China. PLoS One 3, e2166.
  • 8Burgoon L D, Eckel-Passow J E, Gennings C, et al. (2005). Protocols for the assurance of microarray data quality and process control. Nucleic Acids Research 33(19),e 172.
  • 9Bilban M, Buehler L, Head S, et al. (2002). Defining signalthresholds in DNA microarrays: exemplary application for invasive cancer. BMC Genomics 3, 19.
  • 10Tran P H, Peiffer D A, Shin Y, et aL (2002). Microarray optimizations: increasing spot accuracy and automated identification of true microarray signals. Nucleic Acids Res 30, e54.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部