期刊文献+

Removal of sulfamethoxazole by nanofiltration membrane

Removal of sulfamethoxazole by nanofiltration membrane
原文传递
导出
摘要 The retention of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) by nanofiltration (NF) membranes is strongly influenced by the pH value of the solution. The retention of SMZ reaches its peak value when the solution pH rises above its pKa2 value as the compound transforms into a negatively charged species. Charge repulsion is the main mechanism involved in SMZ removal by NF membranes. In this study, the removal of SMZ by NF membranes, as a function of solution chemistry, was examined at pH 8.9 to investigate the effect of solution conditions on charge repulsion. The results show that the retention of negatively charged SMZ is relatively independent of SMZ concentration, and an increase in the ionic strength of the solution causes a relatively small reduction in retention. A small effect of humic acid (HA) on SMZ retention was noticed at pH 8.9, which can be explained by a small but insignificant improvement in the zeta potential of the membrane caused by HA at high pH values. However, it was found that SMZ concentration in the feed decreased significantly in solutions containing tannic acid (TA). The Adams-Bohart model was applied to our experimental data and was found to be suitable for describing the initial part of the breakthrough curves. The adsorptive parameters of the membrane were determined. The retention of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) by nanofiltration (NF) membranes is strongly influenced by the pH value of the solution. The retention of SMZ reaches its peak value when the solution pH rises above its PKa2 value as the compound transforms into a negatively charged species. Charge repulsion is the main mechanism involved in SMZ removal by NF membranes. In this study, the removal of SMZ by NF membranes, as a function of solution chemistry, was examined at pH 8.9 to investigate the effect of solution conditions on charge repulsion. The results show that the retention of negatively charged SMZ is relatively independent of SMZ concentration, and an increase in the ionic strength of the solution causes a relatively small reduction in retention. A small effect of humic acid (HA) on SMZ retention was noticed at pH 8.9, which can be explained by a small but insignificant improvement in the zeta potential of the membrane caused by HA at high pH values. However, it was found that SMZ concentration in the feed decreased significantly in solutions containing tannic acid (TA). The Adams-Bohart model was applied to our experimental data and was found to be suitable for describing the initial part of the breakthrough curves. The adsorptive parameters of the membrane were determined.
出处 《Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A(Applied Physics & Engineering)》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2010年第11期868-878,共11页 浙江大学学报(英文版)A辑(应用物理与工程)
基金 Project supported by the Key Laboratory of Yangtze Aquatic Envi-ronment, Ministry of Education, Tongji University (No. PCRRK- 08006)
关键词 Pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) Nanofiltration (NF) membrane Electronic exclusion Adsorption Sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) Pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs), Nanofiltration (NF) membrane, Electronic exclusion, Adsorption,Sulfamethoxazole (SMZ)
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Agbekodo, K.M., Legube, B., Dard, S., 1996. Atrazine and simazine removal mechanisms by nanofiltration: influence of natural organic matter concentration. Water Research, 30(11):2535-2542. [doi:10. 1016/S0043-1354 (96)00128-5].
  • 2Aksu, Z., Gonen, F., 2004. Biosorption of phenol by immobilized activated sludge in a continuous packed bed: prediction of breakthrough curves. Process Biochemistry, 39(5):599-613. [doi: 10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00132-8].
  • 3Andreozzi, R., Raffaele, M., Nicklas, E, 2003. Pharmaceuticals in STP effluents and their solar photodegradation in aquatic environment. Chemosphere, 50(10):1319-1330. [doi: 10.1016/90045-6535(02)00769-5].
  • 4Batt, A.L., Kim, S., Aga, D.S., 2007. Comparison of the occurrence of antibiotics in four full-scale wastewater treatment plants with varying designs and operation. Chemosphere, 68(3):428-435. [doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.008].
  • 5Bellona, C., Drewes, J.E., Xu, P., Amy, G., 2004. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment--a literature review. Water Research, 38(12): 2795-2809, [doi: 10. 1016/j.watres.2004.03.034].
  • 6Childress, A.E., Elimelech, M., 1996. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 119(2):253-268. [doi:10.1016/0376- 7388(96)00127-5].
  • 7Clara, M., Strenn, B., Gans, O., 2005. Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 39(19): 4797-4807. [doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.09.015].
  • 8Comerton, A.M., Andrews, R.C., Bagley, D.M., Yang, P., 2007 Membrane adsorption of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceutically active compounds. Journal of Membrane Science, 303(1-2):267-277. [doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.07.025].
  • 9Heberer, T., 2002. Tracking persistent pharmaceutical residues from municipal sewage to drinking water. Journal of Hydrology, 266(3-4):175-189. [doi:10.1016/S0022-1694 (02)00165-8].
  • 10Hu, J.Y., Jin, X., Ong, S.L., 2007. Rejection of estrone by nanofiltration: Influence of solution chemistry. Journal of Membrane Science, 3112(1-2):188-196. [doi:10.1016/j. memsci.2007.06.043].

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部