摘要
证据规定中原告的举证责任内涵模糊不清,建议确立结果责任意义上的举证责任原则。证明标准的缺失加剧了举证责任的不确定,建议区分起诉人的初步证明责任和原告的举证责任。证据规定遗漏了因事实行为引发的行政赔偿诉讼中原告的举证责任,建议增补完善。原告对某些程序性事实应承担举证责任。
The meaning of the plaintiff's burden of evidence in The Regulations of Evidence is not clear,so suggest establishing the principal of the consequential responsibility.The lack of proof standard intensifies the uncertainty of the burden of evidence,so suggest distinguishing between the suitor's preliminary burden of proof and the plaintiff's burden of evidence.The plaintiff's burden of evidence in the administrative compensation litigation which is caused by factual actions was not stipulated in The Regulations of Evidence,so suggest to perfect it.The plaintiff undertakes the burden of evidence that proofs procedural facts to some extent.
出处
《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》
2010年第4期7-10,共4页
Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词
证据规定
原告
举证责任
the Regulations of Evidence
the plaintiff
the burden of evidence