期刊文献+

行政诉讼中原告的举证责任 被引量:1

The Burden of Evidence of the Plaintiff in Administrative Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 证据规定中原告的举证责任内涵模糊不清,建议确立结果责任意义上的举证责任原则。证明标准的缺失加剧了举证责任的不确定,建议区分起诉人的初步证明责任和原告的举证责任。证据规定遗漏了因事实行为引发的行政赔偿诉讼中原告的举证责任,建议增补完善。原告对某些程序性事实应承担举证责任。 The meaning of the plaintiff's burden of evidence in The Regulations of Evidence is not clear,so suggest establishing the principal of the consequential responsibility.The lack of proof standard intensifies the uncertainty of the burden of evidence,so suggest distinguishing between the suitor's preliminary burden of proof and the plaintiff's burden of evidence.The plaintiff's burden of evidence in the administrative compensation litigation which is caused by factual actions was not stipulated in The Regulations of Evidence,so suggest to perfect it.The plaintiff undertakes the burden of evidence that proofs procedural facts to some extent.
作者 孙姗姗
机构地区 上海交通大学
出处 《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》 2010年第4期7-10,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators
关键词 证据规定 原告 举证责任 the Regulations of Evidence the plaintiff the burden of evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1高家伟.论行政诉讼证据制度的特殊性[A].何家弘.证据法论坛(第三卷)[C] 北京:中国检察出版社,2001.319.
  • 2马怀德,刘东亮.行政诉讼证据问题研究[A].何家弘.证据学论坛第4卷[C].北京:中国检察出版社,2002.
  • 3[日]高桥宏志.证明责任[A].林剑峰译.何家弘.证据学论坛(第六卷)[C].北京:中国检察出版社,2003.

共引文献2

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部