期刊文献+

膳食实物测试对住院糖尿病患者膳食认知的影响研究 被引量:6

Influence of dietary test on dietary cognition among diabetic inpatients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究由河南省人民医院营养室设计的膳食实物测试方法,对住院糖尿病患者膳食认知的影响.方法 选择134例住院糖尿病患者,给予一日糖尿病标准餐进行膳食实物测试,分别测量测试前后患者对油、盐、主食、蔬菜、肉类五类食物的摄入量的自我评价,采用非参数检验对测试结果的均值进行差异显著性分析.结果 糖尿病患者对油、盐、主食、肉类四类食物摄入量的自我评价,测试后高于测试前,差异有统计学意义(Z值分别为-4.642,-8.700,-2.218,-5.528,P〈0.05);而对蔬菜摄入量的自我评价,测试前后差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.385,P〉0.05).结果 显示糖尿病患者接受膳食实物测试后,对油、盐、主食、肉类四类食物摄入量的认知有明显改变,尤其是油、盐和肉类;而对蔬菜摄入量的认知改变不明显.结论 膳食实物测试可以显著改变糖尿病患者对日常膳食摄入量的认知情况. Abstract:Objective To study the influence of dietary test designed by Nutritional Department of Henan Provincial People's Hospital on diabetic inpatients' dietary cognition. Methods A total of 134 diabetic inpatients were selected and tested with standard diabetic meaL Self-reporting of oil, salt, staple food, vegetables and meat intake was evaluated. Nonparametric tests were used for statistical analysis. Results There were significant differences in self-reporting of oil,salt,staple food and meat intake between pre and post test (Z= -4.642, -8.700, -2.218, -5. 528,all P〈0.05) ; however,no significant change of self reporting vegetable intake was found ( Z = - 1. 385, P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Dietary test can significantly change patients' cognition about their daily dietary intake.
出处 《中华健康管理学杂志》 CAS 2010年第5期279-281,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Management
关键词 糖尿病 膳食 认知 Diabetes mellitus Diet Cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献12

共引文献272

同被引文献31

  • 1陈超刚,苏宜香,严励,黄德芳,夏敏,戚以勤,程桦.2型糖尿病患者接受膳食血糖生成指数教育的相关结果分析[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(31):37-39. 被引量:33
  • 2吴惠英,郑彩娥,李秀央,郑霞云.企业干部242名健康状况的调查与分析[J].中国临床保健杂志,2006,9(1):68-69. 被引量:4
  • 3Shelley E,Taylor.健康心理学[M].朱熊兆,姚树桥,王湘,译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:218.
  • 4陈文彬.诊断学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:35-37.
  • 5Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes : estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care ,2004,27 : 1047-1053.
  • 6ShelleyE.Taylor.健康心理学.5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:404.
  • 7SheHey E,Taylor.健康心理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:404.
  • 8Katz J,Melzack R.Measurement of pain[J].Surg Clin North Am,1999,79(2):231-352.
  • 9Carlsson AM.Assessment of chronic pain.I.Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale[J].Pain,1983,16(1):87-101.
  • 10Randall C,Ihab Isaac,Ahmad Elsharydah,et al.A comparison of the Vebal Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for pain assessment[J].Anesthesiology,2004,8(1):395.

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部