期刊文献+

朱熹理学与佛学心性论比较研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study between the Buddhism and Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism on Theory of Mind-Nature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在心性论上,朱熹理学与佛学之间存在着既相互排斥又相互渗透的关系。儒佛在心性论上的根本不同是儒家以"善恶"论人性,而佛教以"清净"论佛性。朱熹丙戌之悟期间的观点是"性体心用"说,佛教在理论上的错误主要在于误心为性,导致"作用是性"。在心性情关系上,朱熹主张性体情用,而佛教最终走向是去情复性。 On theory of mind-nature,Buddhism and Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism are mutually exclusive and involved.The theory of human nature of Confucianism is based on the idea of "good and evil",while Buddhism contends "pure" Buddha nature.During the phase of Bing Xu Enlightenment,Zhu Xi held that the nature was the essence and acted by mind,and the error of Buddhism was that the mind was considered as nature,which caused the result of nature as action.About the relationship of mind,nature and emotion,Zhu Xi advocated the nature was the essence and acted by emotion,however,Buddhism made claim that emotion should be excluded from it's doctrine and nature be recovered.
作者 黄世福
机构地区 安徽大学哲学系
出处 《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第5期6-10,共5页 Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)
关键词 朱熹理学 佛学 心性论 性体心用 性体情用 Zhu Xi's Neo-Confucianism Buddhism theory of mind-nature nature-mind theory nature-emotion theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔.朱子全书(第13册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 2朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔.朱子全书(第23册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 3朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔.朱子全书(第24册)[M].上海:上海占籍出版社,2002.
  • 4朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔.朱子全书(第22册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 5杨曾文.六祖坛经(敦煌新本)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1993.
  • 6朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔.朱子全书(第25册)[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 7朱杰人,严佐之,刘永翔.朱子全书(第6册)[M].上海:上海占籍出版社,2002.
  • 8《大正藏》第四十八卷,444页.

共引文献2

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部