期刊文献+

车用煤基和天然气基二甲醚燃料的生命周期评价 被引量:1

Life cycle assessment of the natural gas-based and coal-based DME as vehicle fuel
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对煤基二甲醚和天然气基二甲醚作为车用燃料的生命周期内的单位行驶距离的能耗、温室气体CO2排放和主要污染物排放进行了评估。评估中,根据了煤基和天然气基二甲醚的不同生产工艺,结合了车辆数据。结果表明:在全生命周期内,使用天然气基二甲醚作为车用燃料,除了CO排放略高于使用煤基二甲醚做为车用燃料外,其余各项指标均低于使用煤基二甲醚做为车用燃料时的指标;在全生命周期内,无论是使用煤基二甲醚,还是天然气基二甲醚做为车用燃料,它们的可挥发性有机物(VOC)、CO和NOx排放均比使用柴油燃料时低,但它们的能耗、温室气体CO2、颗粒(PM)和SO2排放均比使用柴油燃料时高。 The energy consumption,green house gas CO2 and main pollutant emissions per travel distance in life cycle were assessed when using natural gas-based dimethyl ether(DME) and coal-based DME as vehicle fuel.The assessment was based on different production technologies of the natural gas-based DME and coal-based DME and combined with vehicle data.The results show that all energy consumption and pollutant emissions of the natural gas-based DME are lower than those of the coal-based DME,except for CO emission in life cycle.The volatile organic compound(VOC),CO and NOx emissions of the coal-based DME and natural gas-based DME are lower than those of diesel,however,the energy consumption,CO2,particulate matter(PM) and SO2 emissions of DME are higher than those of diesel.
作者 汪映
出处 《汽车安全与节能学报》 CAS 2010年第3期242-246,共5页 Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy
基金 清华大学汽车安全与节能国家重点实验室开放基金资助项目(KF09102)
关键词 车用燃料 二甲醚(DME) 生命周期评价 能耗 排放 vehicle fuel dimethyl ether(DME) life cycle assessment energy consumption emissions
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1吴锐,任玉珑,雍静,韩唯健,WANG Michael Q.4种天然气基汽车燃料的生命周期3E评价[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,24(9):114-120. 被引量:7
  • 2徐德明.天然气及其转化产品作燃料问题[J].石油与天然气化工,1995,24(1):38-49. 被引量:2
  • 3葛庆杰,黄友梅,张天莉.合成气直接制取二甲醚的双功能催化剂[J].天然气化工—C1化学与化工,1996,21(5):19-22. 被引量:47
  • 4莫飞,于雷,宋国华.车载尾气检测技术及相关研究综述[J].车辆与动力技术,2006(4):57-62. 被引量:14
  • 5刘中民 等.合成气由二甲醚或甲醇制取低碳烯烃[J].油气加工,1998,8(1):6-6.
  • 6Ahlvik P, Brandberg Ake. Well to Wheels Efficiency for Alternative Fuels from Natural Gas or Biomass [ R ]. Swedish : Swedish National Road Administrattion,2001.
  • 7National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Pacific West National Lab. Fuel Cycle Evaluations of Bio-mass-Ethanol and Reformulated Gasoline[ R]. America : USDOE, Office of Transportation Technologies, Office of Planning and Assessment, Golden CO, 1993.
  • 8Weiss M A, Heywood J B, Drake E M, et al. On the Road in 2020 : A Life-Cycle Analysis of New Automobile Technologies. Energy Laboratory Report No. MIT EL-00 -003[R]. America: Energy Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
  • 9General Motors, Argonne National Lab, et al. Well-to-Wheel Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems, in Three Volumes. America[ R]. Argonne National Laboratory, 2001.
  • 10Wang Michael. GREET1.5 Transportation Fuel-Cycle Model: Volume 1 : Methodology, Development, Use and Results[R]. America: Center for Transportation Research, Argonne National Laboratory, 1999.

共引文献31

同被引文献23

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部