期刊文献+

杭菊和怀菊主要功能成分的比较 被引量:3

Comparative Analysis of the Main Functional Components in Hang Chrysanthemum and Huai Chrysanthemum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]对2种不同产地菊花中的天然活性物质进行探索性研究,以期为菊花的开发利用提供理论依据。[方法]采用HPLC法和紫外分光光度计法测定2种不同产地菊花中活性物质的含量。[结果]杭菊和怀菊的绿原酸含量的绿原酸含量分别为3.44±0.17、6.74±0.20(DW)mg/g,RSD值分别为4.87%、2.97%;杭菊和怀菊的游离氨基酸总量分别为50.54±0.27、46.28±1.55(DW)mg/g,RSD值分别为0.53%、3.34%;杭菊和怀菊的总糖含量分别为195.24±1.65、161.95±2.61(DW)mg/g,RSD值分别为0.84%、1.61%。[结论]该研究比较分析了2种不同产地菊花主要功能成分的含量差异,为菊花的开发利用提供了理论依据。 [Objective]The natural active substances in 2 kinds of Chrysanthemum were studied,aiming at providing theoretical evidence for the development and utilization of Chrysanthemum. [Method]The HPLC and UV spectrophotometor were used. [Result]The content of chlorogenic acid in Hang Chrysanthemum and Huai Chrysanthemum were 3.44±0.17 and 6.74±0.20 (DW)mg/g respectively,with RSD value of 4.87% and 2.97% respectively; the content of dissociative amino acid in the two were 50.54±0.27 and 46.28±1.55 (DW)mg/g respectively,with RSD value of 0.53% and 3.34% respectively; the content of total saccharides in the two kinds of Chrysanthemum were 195.24±1.65 and 161.95±2.61 (DW)mg/g respectively,with RSD value of 0.84% and 1.61% respectively. [Conclusion]The main functional components of 2 kinds of Chrysanthemum from different habitats were comparatively analyzed,which will provide theoretical evidence for the development and utilization of Chrysanthemum.
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第24期13049-13051,共3页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 基本科研业务费专项资助(0032010033) 农业部重点实验室开放课题(2010K1005)
关键词 杭菊 怀菊 功能成分 比较分析 Hang Chrysanthemum; Huai Chrysanthemum; Functional components; Comparative analysis;
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献73

共引文献193

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部