1Swam,M.& S.Lapkin.lnteraction and second language learning:Two adolescent French immersion students working together[J].The Modern Language Journal,1998,82:320-37.
3R.ao,Zhenhui.R.econciling communicative approaches to the teaching of English with tradidonal chinese methods[J].Research in the Teaching of English,1996,30(4):458-71.
4Larsen-Freeman,D.Teaching Language:From Grammar to Grammating[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2005.
5Nunan,D.Second Language Teaching and Learning[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2001.
3Alanen R. Input enhancement & rule presentation in second language acquisition [ A ]. In R Schmidt. Attention & Awareness in Foreign Language Learning[ C ]. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1995.
4Benati A. The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of Italian future tense [ A ]. In B Van Patten. Processing Instruction [ C ]. Hillsdale, NJ :Erlbaum, 2003.
5Bialystok E. Representation & ways of knowing: Three issues in SLA[ A]. In N Ellis. Implicit & Explicit Learning of Language[C]. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1994.
6Carroll S & Swain M. Explicit & implicit negative feedback: An investigation into the Spanish past tense[ J].Modern Language Journal, 1993, (79) :179 -93.
7Cook V. Second Language Learning and Language Teaching[ M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 1996.
8de Graaff R. The Esperanto experiment : Effects of explicit instruction on SLA [ J ]. Studies in Second language Acquisition, 1997, (19) :249 - 276.
9DeKeyser R. Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system [ J ].Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1995, (17) :379 -410.
10DeKeyser R. Beyond focus on form[A]. In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition [ C ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1998.