期刊文献+

项目反应理论(IRT)在人格障碍测评工具C类分量表上的应用 被引量:3

Application of IRT to PDQC-3
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察以CCMD-3人格障碍诊断标准编制的筛查问卷(PDQC-3)中C群人格障碍项目的评估效力,为筛查问卷的进一步修改和精简提供依据。方法:用PDQC-3对1248名大学生施测,应用项目反应理论及其方法,针对C群人格障碍项目集中进行分型项目功能分析和维度项目功能分析。结果:依赖型人格障碍所含11个项目中6个项目评估效力较佳、2个项目中等、3个项目较差;负性体验/依赖维度所含15个项目中5个项目评估效力较佳、8个项目中等、2个项目较差。结论:依赖型人格障碍所含项目作为一个整体可对中等依赖水平的被试提供较为精确的评估,在低水平和高水平依赖特质范围内表现得不够精确;而负性体验/依赖维度所含项目作为一个整体对于中高负性体验/依赖特质水平的被试均能提供较为精确的评估;维度评估能为人格障碍的筛查提供更为丰富的信息。 Objective: To study the assessment power of the items in the Cluster C of Personality Disorder Screening Questionnaire PDQC-3 based on CCMD-3 personality disorder diagnostic criteria and then to provide some advice for further revision and refining of the items.Methods: PDQC-3 was used to survey 1248 college students,and then a categorical and dimensional item function analysis was administered to Cluster C personality disorder items.Results: In PDQC-3,DPD contained 11 items,of which 6 items’ assessment power was good to perfect,2 items’ assessment power reached medium level,and 3 items’ assessment power was poor.Negative experience/dependency dimension had 15 items,of which 5 items’ assessment power was good to perfect,8 items’ assessment power reached medium level,and 2 items’ assessment power was poor.Conclusion: The items of DPD as a whole can provide an accurate assessment to the subjects with medium dependence,but its function at a low level and high level of dependence is not good.And the items of negative experience/dependence dimension as a whole can provide an accurate assessment to the subjects with medium to high level of negative experience/dependence,suggesting that dimensional assessment can provide more information for the screening of personality disorder.
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2010年第5期575-578,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 深圳市科技计划项目(200627)
关键词 C群人格障碍 维度 项目反应理论 项目功能分析 Cluster C personality disorder Dimension Item response theory Item function analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000.
  • 2朱宁宁,张厚粲.CTT与IRT方法对人格测验结果处理的比较研究[J].心理学探新,2003,23(3):48-51. 被引量:14
  • 3Paris J, Frank H, Buonvino M, et al. Recollections of parental behavior and axis II cluster diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1991, 5:102-106.
  • 4Tore Gude, Per vaglum. One-year follow-up of patients with cluster C personality disorders: A prospective study comparing patients with "pure" and comordib conditions within cluster C, and "pure" C with Journal of Personality Disorders, 2001, 15(3): 216-228.
  • 5Alnaes R, Torgersen S. Personality and personality disorders predict development and relapses of major depression. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinaviea, 1997, 95:336-342.
  • 6李江雪,项锦晶.人格诊断问卷(PDQ-4+)在研究生群体中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(6):580-582. 被引量:14

二级参考文献14

  • 1傅文青,姚树桥.2592例大学生人格诊断问卷(PDQ^(+4))测试结果分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2004,18(9):621-623. 被引量:51
  • 2Embretson S E, Reise S P. Item response theory for psychologists [ M ]. London: Lawee.nce Erlbawn Associates, 2000.13 - 39,323 - 324.
  • 3Steinberg L, Thissen D. Item reapome theory in personality research[A]. In P E Shrout, S T Fiske (Eds).Personality research, methods, and theory: A festscbrift benoring Donald W Flake [ C]. Hillsda]a, NJ:Lawrence Ernbaum Associates, 1995. 161- 181.
  • 4Reise S P. Personality Measurement issures viewed through the eyes of IRT[A]. In S E Embretson, S L Hershberger (Eds), The new rules of measurement: What every psychologist and educator should know[C].N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.219 - 242.
  • 5Samejima F. The graded response model[Z]. In W J van der Linden, R K Hambleton (Eds), Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer, 1996.
  • 6Thissen D. MULTILOG user's guide: Multiple categorical item analysis and test scoring taring item response theory computer software[ M]. Chicago: Soientific Software Int, 1991.
  • 7Baron J, Siepmann M. Techniques for Creating and Using Web Questionnaires in Research and Teaehing[A].In M H Birnbaum (Eds), Psychological Experiments on the Internet[C]. Academic Press,2000.235.
  • 8Fan X. Item response theory and clasaical test theory: An empirical comparison of their item/person statistics[J].Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1998, 58:357 - 381.
  • 9Hyler SE,Skodd AE,OldhamJM,et al.Validity of the personality diagnostic questionnaire revision:A replication in an outpatient samplel Comprehensive Psychiatry,1992,33:73-771
  • 10Jian Yang,Rorbert RM,Paul TC,et al.The cross-cultural generalization of Axis-Ⅱ constructs:a evaluation of two personality disorder assessment instrument in the people' republic of China Journal of Personality Disorders,2000,14(3):249-2631

共引文献26

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部