期刊文献+

组织冲突问卷(ROCI-Ⅱ)在中国大学生中的因素结构研究 被引量:6

Factorial Structure of Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-Ⅱ in Chinese College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探索组织冲突问卷ROCI-Ⅱ(Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-Ⅱ)在中国大学生中的因素结构。方法:采用组织冲突问卷ROCI-Ⅱ中文版,对570名大学生施测。对365个一般大学样本数据使用SPSS进行探索性因素分析,对另外205个重点大学样本数据用Lisrel8.70进行验证性因素分析。结果:探索性因素分析得出四因素结构,四因素分别为协作、顺从、回避和支配。四个因素累积解释率为43.77%。验证性因素分析结果显示:χ2/df=2.45,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.89,CFI=0.95,NFI=0.93,NNFI=0.93,RMSEA=0.076。结论:ROCI-II中文版的四因素结构在中国大学生人群中更合理。 Objective: To explore the factorial structure of Rahim Organizational Conflict Inventory-Ⅱ(ROCI-Ⅱ) in a sample of Chinese college students.Methods: A total of 570 college students were recruited for this study;365 of the common college students sample was used for exploratory factor analysis and the other 205 key university students sample for confirmatory factor analysis.Results: Exploratory factor analysis showed that four factors were better,i.e.,collaborating,obliging,avoiding and dominating,and the results of confirmatory factor analysis(χ2/df=2.45,GFI=0.94,AGFI=0.89,CFI= 0.95,NFI=0.93,NNFI=0.93,RMSEA=0.076) indicated that this model provided a reasonable good fit for Chinese college students.Conclusion: This study indicates that the four-factor model of ROCI-Ⅱ is adaptable to Chinese college students.
作者 张勇 刘红丽
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 2010年第5期584-586,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 曲阜师范大学科研创新基金项目"人际冲突策略选择影响因素研究"(XJ0723)资助
关键词 组织冲突问卷 验证性因素分析 探索性因素分析 Rahim organizational conflict inventory-Ⅱ Confirmatory factor analysis Exploratory factor analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1唐海波,姜美霞.大学生人际冲突概述[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(1):124-126. 被引量:7
  • 2王琦,杜永怡,席酉民.组织冲突研究回顾与展望[J].预测,2004,23(3):74-80. 被引量:81
  • 3张翔,樊富珉.大学生人际冲突行为及其与心理健康的关系[J].心理与行为研究,2004,2(1):364-367. 被引量:40
  • 4Rahim MA. A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 1983, 26 (2): 368-376.
  • 5Rahim MA, Magnet NR. Convergent and discriminant validity of the Rahim organizational conflict inventory-II. Psychological Reports, 1994, 74:35-35.
  • 6Rahim MA, Magner NR. Confirmatory factor analysis of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its invariance across groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80(1):122-132.
  • 7Hwang KK. Guanxi and Mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies VII" 1, 1997, 8: 17-39.
  • 8Weider-Hatfield D. Assessing the Rahim organizational conflict inventory-II. Management Communication Quarterly, 1988, 1(3): 350-366.
  • 9Van De VE, Kabanoff B. Toward theory-based measures of conflict management. Academy of Management Journal, 1990, 33(1): 199-209.
  • 10Yu CS, Sardessai RM, Lu J, and Zhao JH. Relationship of emotional intelligence with conflict management styles: An empirical study in China. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2006, 3(2): 19-29.

二级参考文献75

  • 1许燕,梁觉.北京师范生人际冲突处理方式的研究[J].青年研究,1998(4):21-27. 被引量:22
  • 2赵凤娟.大学生人际冲突应对教育浅探[J].思想理论教育导刊,2004(9):61-63. 被引量:20
  • 3曹加平.大学生宿舍人际冲突原因与对策探析[J].江苏大学学报(高教研究版),2006,28(2):27-30. 被引量:45
  • 4Thomas KW, Pondy LR. Towardan "intent"model of conflict management among principal parties. HumanRelations, 1977, 30:1089-1102
  • 5乔.H.特纳.社会学理论的结构.杭州:浙江人民出版社,1987
  • 6Black KA. Gender differences in adolescent's behavior during conflict resolution tasks with best friend. Adolescence, 2000, 35 (139):499-512
  • 7Adams R, Laursen B. The organization and dynamics of adolescent conflict with parents and friend. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2001, 63(1): 14, 97
  • 8Palmer, Jesse. Conflict resolution: Strategies for the elementary classroom. Social Studies, 2001, 1992(2):65-68
  • 9Bsino H. Managing Conflict. Beverly Hills:Sage Publications, 1988
  • 10Morse EA, Savage GT. A test of the motivation sunder lying choice of conflict strategies in the dual-concern model. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1999, 10(1):25- 34

共引文献124

同被引文献73

引证文献6

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部