期刊文献+

Self-consistent field method and non-self-consistent field method for calculating the positron lifetime

Self-consistent field method and non-self-consistent field method for calculating the positron lifetime
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Many methods are used to calculate the positron lifetime, these methods could be divided into two main types. The first method is atomic superposition approximation method and the second one is the so called energy band calculation method. They are also known as the non-self-consistent field method and self-consistent field method respectively. In this paper, we first introduce the two basic methods and then, we take Si as an example and give our calculation results, these results coincide with our latest experimental results, finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods. Many methods are used to calculate the positron lifetime, these methods could be divided into two main types. The first method is atomic superposition approximation method and the second one is the so called energy band calculation method. They are also known as the non-self-consistent field method and self-consistent field method respectively. In this paper, we first introduce the two basic methods and then, we take Si as an example and give our calculation results, these results coincide with our latest experimental results, finally, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the two methods.
出处 《Chinese Physics B》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2010年第11期658-661,共4页 中国物理B(英文版)
基金 Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 10675115) the Important Direction Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
关键词 positron lifetime atomic superposition approzimetion method pseudopotential method positron lifetime, atomic superposition approzimetion method, pseudopotential method
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Dannefaer S, Mascher P and Kerr D 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 2195.
  • 2Saarinen K, Laine T, Kuisma S, Nissila J, Hautojarvi P, Dobrzynski L, Baranowski J M, Pakula K, Stepniewski R, Wojdak M, Wysmolek A, Suski T, Leszczynski M, Grzegory I and Porowski S 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett 79 3030.
  • 3Gebauer J, Krause R R, Domke C, Ebert P and Urban K 1997 Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 3334.
  • 4Krause R, Saarinen K, Hautojarvi P, Polity A, Gartner G and Corbel C 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 3329.
  • 5Puska M J and Nieminen R M 1994 Rev. Mod. Phys. 66 841.
  • 6Puska M J and Nieminen R M 1983 J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 13 333.
  • 7Campillo J M, Ogando E and Plazaola F 2007 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 176222.
  • 8Makkonen I, Hakala M and Puska M J 2006 Phys. Rev. B 73 035103.
  • 9Alatalo M, Barbiellini B, Hakala M, Kauppinen H, Korhonen T, Puska M J, Saarinen K, Hautojarvi P and Nieminen R M 1996 Phys. Rev. B 54 2397.
  • 10Puska M J, Makinen S, Manninen M and Nieminen R M 1989 Phys. Rev. B 39 7666.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部