摘要
目的:探讨中医证的诊断标准、临床研究存在的问题。方法:选择权威文献,对比它们在证的诊断标准方面的差异;结合相关研究分析中医证型临床研究中存在的问题。结果:中医证的诊断标准存在规范性、实用性不足的问题;证型的临床研究普遍缺少客观性。证与相关症状之间具有不同的相关系数。结论:要注重证的诊断标准、规范性、实用性研究;提高中医证型临床研究的客观性。
Objective: Discussing the possible problems of the diagnostic criteria and clinical studies of TCM syndromes. Methods: Comparing the differences of diagnostic criteria of TCM syndromes used by authoritative papers; analyzing the possible problems of the clinical studies of TCM syndromes based on relative research. Results: The diagnostic criteria of TCM syndromes are usually casual and not practical; clinical studies of TCM syndromes are usually not objective; the correlations between TCM syndromes and correlative symptoms are inconsistent. Conclusion: The normalization and practicability of diagnostic criteria of TCM syndromes should be looked into more carefully; the objectivity of clinical studies of TCM syndromes should be improved.
出处
《中华中医药杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第11期1749-1751,共3页
China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy
关键词
证
诊断标准
临床研究
Syndrome
Diagnostic criteria
Clinical study