摘要
茅盾所谓"小资产阶级底立场",暴露现实的黑暗,不认同"出路"。《腐蚀》用较多篇幅展现黑暗与光明之间的对立,暗示后者为唯一的正确出路。借助结构分析的方法,发现了存在于深层叙事结构中的某种矛盾和断裂,《腐蚀》在文本表层的新变化形成了由指明希望的所在走向宣布拯救虚无的叙事尴尬。茅盾无法以存在于文学想象中的廉价许诺为解决矛盾的办法,"右倾"的小资产阶级只有追求幻灭、拯救虚无之后的沉沦和毁灭。
Position of petty-borgeois called by MAO Dun, exposed the dark society, do not agree with escape. Corrosion devoted much attention to show the opposition between darkness and light, suggesting the latter as the only correct way out. By using the method of stuctural analysis, I find there was a deep contradiction in narrative structure and fracture,New changes in surface of the text formed narrative embarrassment from leading lightness to declaring rescuing nihility. MAO Dun can not resolve the conflict by cheap promise in the literatural imagination. Right deviation of the petty bourgeoisie can only turn into sinking and destruction after rescuing nihility.
出处
《武汉工程大学学报》
CAS
2010年第10期75-80,共6页
Journal of Wuhan Institute of Technology
关键词
赵的故事
革命成长叙事
结构分析
小资产阶级
拯救虚无
Zhao's story
narrative of revolutionary growth
structural analysis
petty bourgeoisie
rescuing nihility