期刊文献+

临床研究证据的质量评价——以小儿肾脏疾病的治疗为例 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 1948年世界上第一个随机对照试验产生,肯定了链霉素治疗肺结核的疗效。1992年,随着临床研究方法学、证据的分析加工技术、传播技术和媒介的综合发展,有学者提出了循证医学(Evidence-based medicine)的概念并广为传播。随着其概念的提出与普及,大量高质量的临床研究被陆续发表,为临床医师的工作提供了很好的参考依据。
作者 孙嫱 沈颖
出处 《中华儿科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期810-813,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pediatrics
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1杨焕.从循证医学浅谈药物评价与审评质量.第二届药品技术审评研讨会论文集,2003:538-540.
  • 2刘鸣.应正确评价和使用循证医学证据[J].中国循证医学杂志,2006,6(2):77-79. 被引量:34
  • 3郭琼,罗志刚,崔勇,王毅.肾结石治疗方法随机对照试验的Meta-分析[J].社区医学杂志,2007,5(01S):16-17. 被引量:1
  • 4Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials,1996,17:1-12.
  • 5Banares R,Albillos A,Rinc6n D,et al.Endoscopic treatment versus endoscopic plus pharmacologic treatment for acute variceal bleeding:a meta-analysis.Hepatology,2002,35:609-615.
  • 6Durkan AM,Hodson EM,Willis NS,et al.Immunosuppressive agents in childhood nephrotic syndrome:A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Kidney Int,2001,59:1919-1927.
  • 7Ponticelli C,Edefonti A,Ghio L,et al.Cyclosporin versus cyclophosphamide for patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome:a multicentre randomized controlled trial.Nephrol Dial Transplant,1993,8:1326-1332.
  • 8McCrory WW,Shibuya M,Lu WH,et al.Therapeutic and toxic effects observed with different dosage programs of cyclophosphamide in treatment of steroid-responsive but frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome.J Pediatr,1973,82:614-618.
  • 9范铁艳,程留芳.结扎和硬化疗法治疗肝硬化食管静脉曲张出血疗效比较的荟粹分析[J].世界华人消化杂志,2006,14(17):1704-1709. 被引量:22
  • 10Olivo SA,Macedo LG,Gadotti IC,et al.Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials:a systematic review.Phys Ther,2008,88:156-175.

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘鸣.脑卒中临床试验设计与实施应注意的若干问题[J].中华神经科杂志,2004,37(4):289-291. 被引量:5
  • 2de Franchis R,Primignani M.Why do varices bleed? Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1992; 21:85-101
  • 3Jadad AR,Moore RA,Carroll D,Jenkinson C,Reynolds DJ,Gavaghan DJ,McQuay HJ.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17:1-12
  • 4Hou MC,Lin HC,Lee FY,Chang FY,Lee SD.Recurrence of esophageal varices following endoscopic treatment and its impact on rebleeding:comparison of sclerotherapy and ligation.J Hepatol 2000; 32:202-208
  • 5Lo GH,Lai KH,Cheng JS,Hwu JH,Chang CF,Chen SM,Chiang HT.A prospective,randomized trial of sclerotherapy versus ligation in the management of bleeding esophageal varices.Hepatology 1995; 22:466-471
  • 6Laine L,el-Newihi HM,Migikovsky B,Sloane R,Garcia F.Endoscopic ligation compared with sclerotherapy for the treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.Ann Intern Med 1993; 119:1-7
  • 7Stiegmann GV,Goff JS,Michaletz-Onody PA,Korula J,Lieberman D,Saeed ZA,Reveille RM,Sun JH,Lowenstein SR.Endoscopic sclerotherapy as compared with endoscopic ligation for bleeding esophageal varices.N Engl J Med 1992; 326:1527-1532
  • 8Gimson AE,Ramage JK,Panos MZ,Hayllar K,Harrison PM,Williams R,Westaby D.Randomised trial of variceal banding ligation versus injection sclerotherapy for bleeding oesophageal varices.Lancet 1993; 342:391-394
  • 9Baroncini D,Milandri GL,Borioni D,Piemontese A,Cennamo V,Billi P,Dal Monte PP,D'Imperio N.A prospective randomized trial of sclerotherapy versus ligation in the elective treatment of bleeding esophageal varices.Endoscopy 1997; 29:235-240
  • 10Sackett DL,Straus SE,Richardson WS,et al.Evidence-based medicine:how to practice and teach EBM.2nd edition,Churchill Livingstone,London.2000.

共引文献54

同被引文献21

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部