期刊文献+

基于描述逻辑的CWM元数据冲突的检测和消解 被引量:1

Inconsistency Checking and Resolving of CWM Metadata Based on Description Logics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 元数据内容的冲突能够对数据仓库系统的稳定性和可靠性造成极大影响。在基于公共仓库元模型(CWM)建立元数据的过程中,参与建立元数据的团体的不同经验以及描述数据的不同视角不可避免地会带来元数据的这些冲突。然而,CWM的图形化特点导致了它缺乏精确的语义,所以如何自动检测和消解这些冲突,至今没有得到很好的解决。首先提出了一种支持概念之上的同一性约束的描述逻辑,用来对CWM元模型和元数据进行描述,然后阐述了利用该描述逻辑形式化CWM元模型和元数据的方法,接着研究了利用描述逻辑的查询推理能力检测元数据冲突的方法,最后研究了通过在知识库中定义冲突消解规则,消解元数据冲突的方法。利用推理引擎RACER所进行的实验结果表明提出的方法是可行的。 The inconsistencies in metadata have remarkable influence on the stability and reliability of data warehouse system.During the metadata creation based on Common Warehouse Metamodel(CWM),the different experiences and views of describing data of organizations involved in metadata creation bring metadata inconsistencies inevitably.However,detecting and resolving these inconsistencies in CWM metadata automatically is difficult because CWM metamodel and metadata are rendered to users by graphs,which lack precise semantics.In this paper,we researched how to check and resolve CWM metadata inconsistencies in terms of a logic belonging to Description Logics.First,how to formalize CWM metamodel and metadata by means of the presented Description Logic DLidwhich supports identification constraints on concepts was researched.Then the approach for checking metadata inconsistencies by query and reasoning mechanism of DLidwas researched.At last,the approach for resolving inconsistencies through defining inconsistency resolution rules in DLidknowledge base was proposed.The results of the experiments with reasoning engine RACER are encouraging.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期166-171,共6页 Computer Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(10402013)资助
关键词 公共仓库元模型(CWM) 描述逻辑 元数据集成 冲突检测 冲突消解 Common warehouse metamodel(CWM) Description logic Metadata integration Inconsistency checking Inconsistency resolving
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1University of Southern California.Loom Knowledge Represen-tation System4.0[]..2004
  • 2Haarslev V,Moller R,Wessel M.RacerPro User’s Guide Ver-sion2.0[]..2009
  • 3MacGregor R.Inside the LOOM description classifier[].SI-GART Bull.1991
  • 4Margaritopoulos T,Margaritopoulos M,Mavridis I,et al.A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment[].Proceedings of theDublin Core and Metadata Applications Conference:Metadata for Semantic and Social Applications(DC-MI).2008
  • 5Hauch R,Miller A,Cardwell R.Information intelligence:meta-data for information discovery,access,and integration[].Pro-ceedings of theACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data.2005
  • 6Cabot J,Clariso R,Riera D.Verification of UML/OCL Class Di-agrams Using Constraint Programming[].Proceedings of theIEEE International Conference on Software Testing Verifi-cation and Validation.2008
  • 7Satoh K,Kaneiwa K,Uno T.Contradiction Finding and Minimal Recovery for UML Class Diagrams[].Proceedings of thest IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering.2006
  • 8Motik B,Grau B C,Horrocks I,et al.Representing Structured Objects Using Description Graphs[].Proceedings of theth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Represen-tation and Reasoning(KR).2008
  • 9Franz Baader,Carsten Lutz.Description logic[].The Hand-book of Modal Logic.2006
  • 10J. Simmonds.Consistency maintenance of uml models with description logic[]..2003

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部