期刊文献+

上市银行董事会独立性、CEO薪酬与绩效——来自中国上市银行的经验证据 被引量:15

Board Independence of Listed Banks,CEO Compensation,and Performance——Empirical Evidence from Chinese Listed Banks
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文通过收集2006~2009年11家上市的全国股份制商业银行的数据,实证分析了银行董事会独立性与CEO薪酬的关系,并在考虑银行CEO薪酬内生性基础上,进一步检验了银行董事会独立性、CEO薪酬和绩效的关系。研究结果显示,银行董事会规模越大、内部董事越多、CEO任期越长以及CEO兼任董事长的董事会的独立性越差,独立性较差的董事会的监督效率也较低,此时,银行CEO的薪酬更容易偏离股东利益,加大银行的代理成本。此外,研究还发现,银行CEO薪酬与银行绩效之间的敏感性不强,即银行CEO薪酬越高并不意味着银行业绩越显著。 Through the collection data that 11 listed commercial banks from 2006 to 2009, the authors empirically examine the relations between bank CEO compensation and board-of-director independence and the relationship between CEO compensation, board-of-director independence and bank performance taking into account the endogeneity of CEO compensation. The evidence suggests that board of larger board, higher proportion of inside directors in board, long-tenure CEO and CEO who also chairs the board, its independence is worse. Board independence is worse and its surveillance efficiency is also low. In this case, the bank CEO compensation is easier to deviate the shareholder benefit, enlarges agency cost in these banks. In addition, the research also finds that the bank between CEO compensation and bank performance sensitivity is not strong. That is, bank CEO compensation being higher does not mean that the bank performance is more remarkable.
出处 《山西财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第10期88-94,共7页 Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics
基金 国家杰出青年基金项目"企业理论"(项目编号:70525005)的阶段性成果
关键词 上市银行 董事会独立性 CEO薪酬 listed banks board independence CEO compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1宋增基,陈全,张宗益.上市银行董事会治理与银行绩效[J].金融论坛,2007,12(5):35-40. 被引量:41
  • 2Lambert,R,Larcker,D,Weigelt,K.The Structureof Organizational Incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly . 1993
  • 3Caprio G,Laeven L,Levine,R.Governance and Bank Valuation. NBER Working Papers No. 10158 .
  • 4Prowse,S.Alternative Methods of Corporate Control in Commercial Banks. Economic Review . 1995
  • 5John,K,Qian,Y.ncentive Feature in CEO Compensation in the Banking Industry. Economic Policy . 2003
  • 6John,K,Mehran,H,Qian,Y.Regulation Subordinated Debt and Incentive of CEO Compensation in the Banking Industry. . 2003
  • 7M.J. Conyon,S.I. Peck.‘Board control, remuneration committees, and top management compensation,’. The Academy of Management Journal . 1998
  • 8Jensen M C,Meckling W H.Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Capital Structure. The Journal of Finance . 1976
  • 9Fama E,Jensen M.Seperation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics . 1983
  • 10Hall B,Leibman J.Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats. Quarterly Journal . 1998

二级参考文献25

  • 1潘敏.商业银行公司治理:一个基于银行业特征的理论分析[J].金融研究,2006(3):37-47. 被引量:103
  • 2Agarwal,A.,Knoeber.,1996.Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders [J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, (31) :377-397.
  • 3Arthur,N.,2001.Board Composition as the Outcome of an Internal Bargaining Process: Empirical Evidence[J]. Journal of Corporate Financial, (7) :307-340.
  • 4Bhagat,S.,and Black,B.,1999.The Uncertain Relationship Between Board Composition and Firm Performance[J]. Business Lawyer,(54):921-963.
  • 5Caprio, G., Laeven, L., and Levine, R., 2003.Governance and Bank Valuation[R]. NBER Working Paper 101581.
  • 6Dunn, J.,1987. On the Convergence of Projected Gradient Process to Singular Critical Points[ J ]. Optim.Theory Appl, ( 56 ) : 203-216.
  • 7Fama, E.,1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of Tile Firm[J]. Journal of Political Economy, (88) :288-307.
  • 8Fama, E., and Jensen, M., 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, (26):301-325.
  • 9Fosberg, R.,1989. Outside Directors and Managerial Monitoring [J]. ABER, (2) :24-32.
  • 10Hermalin,B., and Weisbach,M.,1991. The Effect of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance[J]. Financial Management, (20) : 101-112.

共引文献40

同被引文献298

引证文献15

二级引证文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部