“虚幻的道德”抑或“真实的法律”——以“南京换偶案”为视角

"Illusive Morality" or "Authentic Law":In the Perspective of Exchanging Yokemate in Nanjing

道德与法律的争辩牵涉到责任归咎的现实选择问题,如何穿行于道德与法律的精神领地而有一合乎理性的结论得出值得深究。"南京换偶"案折射出了现代社会突破传统禁忌寻求性多样化的主张,道德与法律规制的抉择决定了公民自由行使的场域。道德的虚幻与法律的真实不是彼此绝裂的绝对性存在,二者在价值层面的关联及其契合也不是抹杀彼此调整对象相对独立的实质理由,把尚无触及公共与他人利益的聚众换偶行为置于道德范畴仍是当前的不二选择。

The dispute between moral and law involves the responsibility choice,so it is an important thing to make a conclusion by way of analyzing their internal inspirit. Exchanging yokemate in Nanjing embodies the fact that modern society breaks traditional prohibitions to pursue diversiform sexual love. Illusive morality and authentic law do not separate each other,and their value conjunction and accordance does not write off respective domination,thus the exchanging yokemate no endangering external benefit shall be remained with morality.