期刊文献+

元话语的评价赋值功能 被引量:36

Metadiscourse and Its Evaluation-assigning Function
原文传递
导出
摘要 现有研究表明,元话语与评价资源联系密切。本文认为,元话语本身虽然不具有显性的评价功能,但是它和具有评价色彩的语言资源之间的联系具有一定的语篇属性。本文旨在考察学术语篇中元话语的分布及其与正值和负值语言资源之间的配置特征。通过建立小型语料库,我们分析学术书评中元话语资源与正值评价和负值评价资源之间的配置关系,并描述作者如何使用元话语实现与读者恰当的社会互动。分析表明,元话语具有评价赋值的功能。分析同时说明,元话语是一种重要的分析书面语篇的方法。 The article holds that metadiscourse does not carry evaluative meaning, but the connection between metadiscourse and evaluative resources is determined by generic properties of a given text type. It therefore examines the frequencies and pragmatic purposes of metadiscourse in the relatively neglected genre of book reviews. Basing our analysis on a small-sized corpus, we describe the metadisconrse that helps to construe positive and negative evaluation. The analysis shows that metadiscourse construes the framing and assigning of evaluations beyond the propositional meaning of discourse and realizes sociopragmarie functions, and that metadisconrse is an important approach to written discourse analysis.
出处 《外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期1-5,共5页 Foreign Language Education
基金 中国博士后科学基金资助项目"英汉学术论文中的程式语言对比研究"(资助编号:20100470973)的部分成果
关键词 元话语 评价赋值 互动 学术书评 metadiscourse evaluation-assigning interaction academic book reviews
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1杨信彰.元话语与语言功能[J].外语与外语教学,2007(12):1-3. 被引量:79
  • 2Hyland,K.Bringingin the reader:Addressee features in academic arti-cles. Written Communication . 2001
  • 3Hyland,K,P Tse.Metadiscourse in academic writing:A reap-praisal. Applied Linguistics . 2004
  • 4Hunston S,J Sinclair.A local grammar of evaluation. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse . 2000
  • 5Hyland,K.Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. . 1998
  • 6Hyland K.Disciplinary Discourse: Social Interaction in Academic Writing. . 2000
  • 7Vande Kopple,W.Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication . 1985
  • 8Crismore Avon,Raija Makkanen,Margaret Steffenson.Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students. Written Communication . 1993
  • 9Halliday MAK.Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. . 1978
  • 10Hyland,K.Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. . 2005

二级参考文献21

  • 1杨信彰.英语的情态手段与语篇类型[J].外语与外语教学,2006(1):1-4. 被引量:67
  • 2Aijmer, Karin. English Discourse Particles : Evidence from a Corpus[M]. Amesterdam & Philadelphia:John Benjamins,2002.
  • 3Argyle, M. Non-verbal Communication in Human Social Interaction [A]. In R. Hinde ed. Non-verbal Communication [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972.
  • 4Coates, J. Epistemic Modality end Spoken Discourse[J]. Transactions of the Philological Society, 1987,85 : 100 - 131.
  • 5Crismore, A. Talking with Readers : Metadiscourse as Rhetorical act[M]. New York:Peter Lang, 1989.
  • 6Crismore, A. , et al. Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing: A Study of Texts Written by American and Finnish University Students [ J ]. Written Communication, 1993(5) : 184 - 202.
  • 7Grabe, W. and Kaplan, R. Theory and Practice of Writing [M].Harlow: Longman, 1996.
  • 8Halliday, M. A. K. Explorations in the Functions of Language [M]. London:Edward Arnold, 1973.
  • 9Halliday, M. A. K. Language as a Social Semiotic : The Sociological Interpretation of Language and Meaning [ M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
  • 10Halliday, M. A. K. Modes of Meaning and Modes of Expression: types of Grammatical Structure, and Their Determination by Different Semantic Functions[A]. In Allerton, D. J. , Carney, Edward and Holdcroft, David eds. Function and Context in Linguistic analysis [C]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1979.

共引文献78

同被引文献436

引证文献36

二级引证文献137

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部