期刊文献+

操纵策略量表的修订及在大学生中的信效度研究 被引量:2

Revision of manipulation tactics scale and its reliability and validity in college students
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 在大学生群体中修订操纵策略量表,考察其测量学指标.方法 对583名武汉市大学生进行测量,对操纵策略量表进行因素分析和效、信度检验.结果 ①经项目分析和探索性因素分析,保留24个项目,抽取6个因子,可解释方差总变异的64.559%.②验证性因素分析显示此6因素模型拟合良好;操纵策略和人格特质、人际关系相关显著.③内部一致性信度为0.714,0.866,重测信度为0.701,0.837.结论 修订后的操纵策略量表信、效度良好. Objective To revise the manipulation tactics scale (MTS) and examine its reliability and validity. Methods 583 college students were assessed with MTS. Results ①Through item analysis and explore factor analysis, the revised MTS contained 24 items and 6 subscales which could explain 64.559% of the total variances. ②The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the revised MTS had good construct validities. By means of personality traits and social relationship as criteria, the results suggested the criteria incidental validity were sound. ③The Cronbach' s coefficients of the scales were 0.714,0.866, and test-retest reliabilities were 0.701,0.837. Conclusion The revised MTS has good reliability and validity.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期944-945,共2页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
关键词 操纵策略 量表 信度 效度 Manipulation tactics Scale Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

同被引文献44

  • 1Geis F, Christie R, Nelson C. In search of the Machiavelli//Christie R,Geis F. Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press, 1970:76-79.
  • 2Ricks J, Fraedrich J. The paradox of Machiavellianism : Machiavellian- ism may make for productive sales but poor management reviews. J Bus Ethics, 1999,20 : 197-205.
  • 3Gunnthorsdottir A, McCabe K,Smith V. Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. J Econ Psvchd ,2002,23:49-66.
  • 4Jakobwitz S,Egan V. The ' ark triad' of psychopathy and normal per- sonality traits. Pers Indiv Differs, 2006,40:331-339.
  • 5Kessler SR, Bandelli AC, Spector PE, et ah Re-examining Machia- velli: a three-dimensional model of Machiavellianism in the v,,ork- place. J Appl Soc Psychol, 2010, 40: 1868-1896.
  • 6Corzine JB, Buntzman GF, Busch ET. Machiavellianism in U. S. hankers. Int J Organ Anal, 1999, 7: 72-83.
  • 7Paulhus DL, Williams K. The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. J Res Pers , 2002,36:556-568.
  • 8Davies M, Stone T. Synthesis : Psychological understanding and social skills//Repacholi B , Slaughter V. Individual differences in theory of mind. Sussex: Psychology Press, 2003,305-352.
  • 9Paal T, Bereezkei T. Adult theory of mind, cooperation, mehiavellian- ism:the effect of mindreading on social relation. Pers Individ Dif , 2007, 43: 541-551.
  • 10Wastell C, Booth A. Maehiavellianism: An alexithymie perspective. J Soe Clin Psyehol, 2003, 22: 730-744.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部