期刊文献+

信息外部表征形式对初中生学习决策框架效应的影响 被引量:2

The Effects of External Information Representation on Framing Effect in Learning Decision-Making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 333名初中生被分配到基于描述表征的两种条件下,分别对获得框架与损失框架下的风险回避类与风险寻求类学习时间选项进行抉择,以探讨信息外部表征对学习决策框架效应的影响。结果表明:1)在基于描述表征的条件下,学习决策领域中存在框架效应,但有其领域特殊性,被试在获得框架中无明显决策偏向,但在损失框架中的决策明显偏向风险寻求。2)在基于经验表征的条件下,学习决策不存在框架效应。无论是在获得框架还是损失框架中的学习决策均不存在明显的偏向。 Two experiments with different kinds of information representations were conducted to demonstrate the consistency in the choice reversal between a risky and a less risky option of an equally expected value which were described in positive terms(gain framing) or in negative terms(loss framing).Three hundred and thirty-three middle school students were distributed into the first experiment with description-based representation and the second experiment with experience-based representation to make learning decisions in gain framing or loss framing.The results showed that:1) in the first experiment,there was a choice reversal where almost half the subjects who were given the positively framed version of the task selected the option with a certain outcome,whereas the majority of subjects who were given the negatively framed version selected the risky option.2) In the second experiment,there was no such choice reversal between a risky and a less risky option described in either gain framing or loss framing.In conclusion,there was a framing effect in the first experiment with description-based representation,whereas there was no framing effect in the second one with experience-based representation.The inconsistency of choice reversal in the two experiments implied the significant influence of external information representations on the framing effect in the learning decision-making.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期606-611,共6页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NECT-08-0068) 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室(北京师范大学)
关键词 信息外部表征 学习决策 框架效应 初中生 external information representation learning decision-making framing effect middle school students
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Cosmides,L. , & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1 ) , 1 - 73.
  • 2Diacon, S. , & Hasseldine. (2007). Framing effects and risk perception: The effect of prior performance presentation format on investment fund choice. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 31 -52.
  • 3Fagley, N. S. , & Miller, P. M. (1997). Framing effects and arenas of choice: Your money or your life? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71 (3), 355 - 373.
  • 4Gurevich, G. , Kliger, D. , & Levy, O. (2009). Decision-making under uncertainty-A field study of cumulative prospect theory. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33, 1221 - 1229.
  • 5Hertwig, R. , Barron, G. M. ,Weber, E. U. ,& Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15 ( 8 ), 534 - 539.
  • 6Huebner, E. S. , Drane, W. , & Valois, R. F. (2000). Levels and demographic correlates of adolescent life satisfaction reports. School Psychology International, 21 ( 3 ) , 281 - 292.
  • 7Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263 - 291.
  • 8Kim, S. , Oldstein, D. , Hasher. L. , & Zacks, R. T. (2005). Framing effects in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 60 ( 4 ), 215 - 218.
  • 9Park, S. , & Rothrock, L,. (2007). Systematic analysis of framing bias in missile defense: Implications toward visualization design. European Journal of Operational Research, 182, 1383 - 1398.
  • 10Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain and loss-framed messages to promote health behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56, 202 - 220.

二级参考文献72

共引文献113

同被引文献38

  • 1何贵兵,梁社红,刘剑.风险偏好预测中的性别差异和框架效应[J].应用心理学,2002,8(4):19-23. 被引量:49
  • 2边玉芳.学习自我效能感量表的编制[J].心理科学,2004,27(5):1218-1222. 被引量:170
  • 3梁竹苑,许燕,蒋奖.决策中个体差异研究现状述评[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(4):689-694. 被引量:26
  • 4Tversky A, Kahneman D. The Framing of Decisions and The Psychology of Choice [ J]. Science, 1981,211 (4481) ,453.
  • 5Wang X T. Framing Effects: Dynamics and Task Domains[ J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision PRocesses, 1996, 68 (2) .
  • 6Sunghan Kim, David Goldstein, Lynn Hasher, Rose T. Zacks. Framing Effects In Younger And Older Odults[ J]. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences And Social Sciences ,2005 (60) .
  • 7Fagley N S,Miller P M. Framing Effects and Arenas Of Choice: Yourmoney or Your Life [ J ]. Organization Behavior and Hu- man Decision Processes, 1997,71 (3) .
  • 8Lcvin I P, Gaeth G J, Schneider S L, Lauriola M. A New Look At Framing Effects: Distribution of Effect Sizes, Individual Differences,And Independence of Types of Framing [ J ]. Or- ganizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 2002, (88) .
  • 9Bateman C R, Fraedrich J P, Iyer R. Framing Effects Within The Ethical Decision Making P Rocess of Consumers [ J]. Jour- nal of Business Ethics, 2002, 36 (1/2) .
  • 10Mcelroy T, Seta J J,Waringd A. Reflections of The Self: How Self-Esteem Determines Decision Framing and Increases Risk TakingEJ]. Journal Of Behavioral Decisionmaking, 2007 (20).

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部