期刊文献+

腹腔镜全子宫切除与腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除泌尿系受累的对比 被引量:5

Comparison of urinary system affected by totally laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比腹腔镜全子宫切除(TLH)与腹腔镜辅助下阴式子宫切除(LAVH)的泌尿系受累情况。方法回顾性分析2007年10月至2010年8月由同一医师主刀的TLH18例和LAVH22例的病例资料,比较不同手术方式下泌尿系受累的情况。结果两组在年龄、妇科疾病、术前泌尿系基础病及尿常规方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者停留尿管时间,拔除尿管后患者排尿的顺畅情况,术后第1天和术后第6~8天尿常规的红细胞白细胞异常率比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但TLH组的术后第3~5天尿常规结果异常率比LAVH组高(P<0.05),TLH组有1例患者出现术后输尿管下段梗阻需再次手术。结论 TLH比LAVH存在较高的泌尿系受累率。 Objectives To compare of urinary system affected by totally laparoscopic hysterectomy(TLH) and laparoscopical assisted vaginal hysterectomy(LAVH).Methods A retrospective analysis was made for 18 cases of TLH and 22 cases of LAVH which were performed by the same doctor from October 2007 to August 2010.Results There were no significant difference between the two groups on age,gynecological diseases,urinary disease and urine routine before operation(P〉0.05).There were no significant difference between the two groups on catheter stay time,smooth urination rate after removal catheter,urine routine of 1 day after surgery and 6-8 days after surgery(P〉0.05).And there were significant difference between the two groups on urine routine of 3-5 day after surgery(P〈0.05).There was one case with postoperative right lower ureteral obstruction in the TLH group.Conclusions TLH had a higher rate of urinary tract involvement than LAVH.
出处 《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》 2010年第6期11-13,共3页 Chinese Journal of Endourology(Electronic Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金(30772332) 广东省科技计划项目(2009B030801121)
关键词 腹腔镜 全子宫切除 并发症 泌尿 Laparoscopy Total hysterectomy Complications Urinary
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献23

共引文献167

同被引文献39

  • 1鲁永鲜,周宁,刘昕,赵英,张迎辉.阴式大子宫次全切除术的临床探讨[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(10):811-812. 被引量:14
  • 2肖风华,章汉旺.垂体后叶素在腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术中的应用[J].第四军医大学学报,2006,27(2):178-178. 被引量:37
  • 3马迎春,董建春.稀释垂体后叶素在宫腔镜手术中的临床应用[J].中国药物与临床,2007,7(8):636-638. 被引量:1
  • 4NEZHAT CR, BURRELL MO, NEZHAT FR, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection [ J ]. Am J Ohstet Gynecol, 1992,166 (3) :864 - 865.
  • 5GEISLER JP, ORR CJ, KHURSHID N. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy compared with open radical hysterectomy [ J 1. Int J Gynecol Cancer,2010,20 ( 3 ) : 438 - 442.
  • 6PARK SH, CHO HY, KIM HB. Factors determining conversion to laparotomy in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy [ J ]. Gynecol Obstet Invest, 2011,71 ( 3 ) : 193 - 197.
  • 7SCHLENKER B, GRATZKE C, SEITZ M, et al. Minimizing complications during retropubic radical prostatectomy - Is ureteral stenting necessary? [ J ]. Eur J Med Res, 2010,15 ( 3 ) : 121 - 123.
  • 8MUELLER A, THIEL F, LERMANN J, et al. Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) using the Hohl instrument in nonobese and obese women [ J ]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2010,36( 1 ) :159 - 164.
  • 9LIANG Z, CHEN Y, XU H, et al. Laparoscopic nerve - sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes [ J 1. Gynecol Oneo1,2010,119 (2) :202 - 207.
  • 10Abdel-Fattah M,Barrington J,Yousef M,et al.Effect of total abdominal hysterectomy on pelvic floor function[J] .Obstet Gynecol Surv,2004,59(4):299-304.

引证文献5

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部