1Altman D. Statistics in the medical literature. Stat Med, 1999, 18(4): 487-490.
2Berger VW, Bears JD. When can a clinical trial be called 'rand- omized'? Vaccine, 2003, 21(5-6): 468-472.
3Chalmers I. Comparing like with like: some historical milestones in the evolution of methods to create unbiased comparison groups in therapeutic experiments. Int J Epidemiol, 2001, 30(5): 1156-1164.
4Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, et al. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA, 1994, 272(2): 125-128.
5Grimes DA, Schulz KF. A "randomized" controlled trial without randomization. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1996, 175(1): 240-241.
6Mosteller F, Gilbert JP, McPeek B. Reporting standards and research strategies for controlled trials. Agenda for the editor. Controlled Clinical Trials, 1980, 1(1): 37-58.
7Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. "Ihe CONSORT Statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallelgroup ran domized trials, lAMA, 2001, 285(15): 1987-1991.
8Xu L, Chen J, Wang J, et al. Discussion for problems of randomisation methods in treatment and preventing trials published in some of Chinese national level journals. Nat J China, 1999, 79(2): 97-98.
9Tang JL, Zhan SY, Ernst E. Review of randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine. BMJ, 1999, 319: 160-161.
10Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in producing and reporting research relevant to patients and clinicians. Presented in 1 Nov. 2010, the Evidence2010, a congress organized by BMJ, London, UK.
