Prolift系统与普通补片在治疗重度盆腔器官脱垂中的应用比较

Comparative study of prolift system and ordinary mesh repair for severe pelvic organ prolapse

目的比较Prolift系统与普通补片在重度盆腔器官脱垂(POP)患者手术治疗中的疗效差异。方法随机选取48例重度盆腔器官脱垂需要手术治疗的患者,24例接受Prolift系统,24例应用了普通补片(采用加美诗补片)进行全盆底重建术。结果①两者在手术总时间、术中出血量、术后留置尿管时间及术后住院时间上差异没有统计学意义(P>0.05);②加美诗补片出现1例补片侵蚀,1例复发,1例术后出现SUI;③Prolift系统未见并发症发生。结论 Prolift系统在治疗女性重度盆腔器官重度脱垂中效果更佳。

Objective To compare the efficiency of Prolift System and Ordinary Mesh in treatment of severe POP.MethodsThere were forty-eight cases with severe who needed surgery, twenty-four of them were undergone the Prolift System and the others were repaired by Ordinary Mesh （Gymes mesh） in the pelvic floor reconstruction surgery. ResultsBetween two groups, there were no significant difference in total operation time, bleeding the indwelling catheter time and hospitalization time after operating （P〈0.05）; Mesh erosion happened once in Ordinary Mesh, once patient recurred,once patient became SUI in Ordinary Mesh; No complication appered in Prolift System. ConclusionProlift System is more effective and safer in treatment of severe POP.