期刊文献+

经尿道双极等离子体汽化电切术治疗高龄高危前列腺增生症 被引量:7

Transurethal plasmakentic vaporization of prostate for treatment of senior and high risk BPH patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道双极等离子体汽化电切术治疗高龄高危前列腺增生症(BPH)的安全性和有效性。方法回顾性分析经尿道双极等离子体汽化电切术治疗高龄高危前列腺增生症57例的临床资料。结果该组57例高龄高危前列腺增生症患者安全度过围手术期,手术时间30~110min,平均(48.60±17.7)min;切除前列腺组织22~65g,平均(40.05±5.22)g;术中失血80~200mL,平均(140±24.75)mL。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)及残余尿(RUV)与术前相比有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论经尿道双极等离子体汽化电切术是当前最适合治疗高龄高危BPH患者的手术方式之一。 Objective To investigate the safety and efficacy of transurethral plasmakentic vaporization of prostate (TUPKVP) for treatment of senior and high risk benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsThe clinical data of 57 patients with senior and high risk BPH treated with TUPKVP was reviewed.ResultsAll patients were safe during the perioperative period. The mean operative time was (48.60 ± 17.7) min (ranged from 30 min to 110 min); the resected BHP tissue weighted (40.05 ± 5.22) g (ranged from 22 g to 65 g); the volume of intraoperative bleeding was (140 ± 24.75) mL (ranged from 80~200 mL). IPSS, QOL, Qmax and RUV improved significantly compared with preoperation (P 0.05).ConclusionTUPKVP is the one of most suitable treatment for senior and high risk BPH.
作者 陈春延
出处 《中国现代医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第20期3179-3181,共3页 China Journal of Modern Medicine
关键词 经尿道等离子双极汽化电切 前列腺增生症 高龄高危患者 transurethral plasmakentic vaporization benign prostatic hyperplasia high risk patients
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献16

  • 1郑鸣,何坚,彭琛,苏继峰,漆可.经尿道前列腺电汽化术中压力对经尿道电切综合征的影响[J].中国内镜杂志,2004,10(9):27-28. 被引量:9
  • 2何志新,温天奋,彭晓东,何自浪.经尿道前列腺切除(TURP)术后大出血的原因和处理[J].中国临床医学,2004,11(4):610-611. 被引量:29
  • 3秦学斌,张文斌,蒋奕红,林高翔.速尿和3%高渗盐水在预防经尿道电切综合征(TUPPS)的探讨[J].中国现代医学杂志,2006,16(10):1529-1530. 被引量:5
  • 4Botto H,Lebret T, Barre P, et al. Electrovaporization of prostate with the Gyrus Device. J Endourol,2001,15 : 319-322.
  • 5Ramsey EW. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: a review. Can J Urol,2000,7 : 1135-1143.
  • 6Mebust W, Hohgrewe H, Coeket APC, et al. Transurethral prostectomy: immediate and post operative complication. A comparative study of 13 participating institution evaluating 3 885 patients. J Uro1,1989,141:243-247.
  • 7Virdi J, Kapasi F, Chandrasekar P, et al. A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmakinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol,2000,163 (4 suppl) :268-269.
  • 8Donovan JL, Peters TJ, Neal DE, et al. A randomized trial comparing transurethral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and conservative treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign pro6tatic enlargement : the CLasP study. J Urol,2000 ,164 :65-70.
  • 9Donovan JL,Peters TJ,Neal DE,et al .Arandomized taial comparing transure thral resection of the prostate,laser therapy and consercatice treatment of men with symptoms associated with benign prostaticen largement,the cLasp study.J Urol,2000,164:65.
  • 10Virdi J,kapasi F,Chandrasekar P,et al.A prospective randomized study between transurethral vaporization using plasmskinetic energy and transurethral resection of the prostate.J Urol,2000,163(4 suppl):268-269.

共引文献357

同被引文献60

引证文献7

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部