期刊文献+

i—gel喉罩用于腹腔镜胆囊手术患者气道管理的效果 被引量:18

Efficacy of laryngeal mask airway i-gel in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价i—gel喉罩用于腹腔镜胆囊手术患者气道管理的效果。方法择期全麻下拟行腹腔镜胆囊手术患者120例,性别不限,ASA分级I或Ⅱ级,年龄34~62岁,体重45—90咄,随机分为2组(n=60):ProSeal喉罩组(P组)和i-gel喉罩组(I组)。根据体重选择喉罩型号,麻醉诱导后置入喉罩,行机械通气,并经引流管放置胃管。记录喉罩置入次数、喉罩及胃管置入情况、纤支镜检查评分,测定喉罩密封压,观察术中口咽部漏气、低氧血症的发生情况。术中监测Sp02、PET CO2、气道峰压,观察拔除喉罩后恶心、呕吐、呛咳、声嘶、咽喉痛、返流误吸的发生情况,记录麻醉时间、手术时间、拔除喉罩时间及苏醒时间。结果两组麻醉时间、手术时间、拔除喉罩时间及苏醒时间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组术中SpO2、PET CO2、气道峰压均在正常范围内。与P组比较,I组喉罩首次置入成功率和纤支镜检查评分升高,喉罩置入时间缩短(P〈0.05)。两组喉罩和胃管置入成功率均为100%;I组和P组喉罩密封压比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);I组咽喉痛发生率低于P组(P〈0.05),恶心呕吐、呛咳发生率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),两组无一例发生声嘶、返流误吸。结论i-gel喉罩易于置入,气道密封性可靠,通气效果好,不良反应少,可安全有效地用于腹腔镜胆囊手术患者的气道管理。 Objective To assess the efficacy of the laryngeal mask airway i-gel (LMA i-gel) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods One hundred and twenty ASA I or II patients of both sexes, aged 34-62 yr, weighing 45-90 kg, undergoing elective cholecystectomy using fiberoptic laparoscope, were randomized into 2 groups (n = 60 each): LMA i-gel group (group I) and LMA ProSeal group (group P). After induction of anesthesia with sufentanil 0.2 ug/kg, propofol 2.5 mg/kg and vecuronium 0.1 mg/kg, LMA i-gel and LMA ProSeal were inserted in group I and P respectively. A gastric tube was inserted through the drain tube of the LMAs. The number of attempts, success rate, success rate of gastric tube placement, airway seal pressure, SpO2, PET CO2, peak airway pressure and complications (hypoxemia, nausea and vomiting, choking hoarseness, sore throat and regurgitation of gastric contents) were recorded. The fiberoptic laryngoscope seores were assessed after sccessful LMA placement. The anesthesia time, duration of surgery, extubation time and emergence time were also recorded. Results There was no significant difference in the anesthesia time, duration of surgery, extuhation time and emergence time between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). The SpO2, PET CO2 and peak airway pressure were within the normal range during operation in both groups. The first attempt success rate of LMA placement and fiberoptic bronchoscopic scores were significantly higher, and the LMA placement time was significantly shorter in group I than in group P (P 〈 0.05). The success rate of LMA and gastric tube placement was 100% in both groups. The incidence of sore throat was significantly lower in group I than in group P ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion LMA i-gel can provide adequate ventilation during operation with less complications and can be used effectively for cholecystic laparoscopic surgery.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第7期805-807,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
关键词 喉面罩 呼吸 人工 腹腔镜检查 Laryngeal Mask Respiration, artificial Laparoscopy
  • 相关文献

同被引文献95

  • 1颜学滔,程晓莉,郑文忠,罗冬青.地佐辛预防全子宫切除术患者腰硬联合麻醉后寒战的临床观察[J].湖北医药学院学报,2012,31(3):230-232. 被引量:5
  • 2刘展,汪晓东,李立.多学科协作诊治模式下的结直肠外科快速康复流程[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(2):239-242. 被引量:51
  • 3郑颖,连文洁,汪春英,张爱萍,张马忠,黄贞玲,杭燕南.喉罩与气管插管用于全麻乳腺癌根治术的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(4):288-290. 被引量:119
  • 4岳云,田鸣,左明章,等主译.喉罩麻醉原理与实践[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:264.
  • 5Schmidbauer w,Bercker S,Volk T, et al.oesophageal seal of the novel supralaryngeal airway device I-gel in comparison with the laryngeal mask airways Classic and Proseal using a cadaver model.Br J Anaesth,2009; 102(I): 135~ 139.
  • 6Richez B,Saltel L,Banchereau F,et al.A new single usesupraglottic airway device with a noninflatable cuff and an esophagealvent:an observational study of the i-gel[J].Anesth Analg,2008,106(4):1137-1139.
  • 7Uppal V,Fletcher G,Kinsella J.Comparison of the i-gel with thecuffed tracheal tube during pressure-controlled ventilation[J].Br JAnaesth,2009,102(2):264-268.
  • 8Seet E,Rajeev S,Firoz T,et al.Safety and efficacy of laryngeal maskairway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal:a randomizedcontrolled trial[J].Eur J Anaesthesiol,2010,27(7):602-607.
  • 9Shin WJ,Cheong YS,Yang HS,et al.The supraglottic airwayI-gel in comparison with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and classiclaryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized patients[J].Eur JAnaesthesiol,2010,27(7):598-601.
  • 10Teoh WH,Lee KM,Suhitharan T,et al.Comparison of the LMAsupreme vs the i-gel in paralysed patients undergoing gynaecologicallaparoscopic surgery with controlled ventilation[J].Anaesthesia,2010,65(12):1173-1179.

引证文献18

二级引证文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部