期刊文献+

经济周期波动的福利成本研究:分歧与进展 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 宏观经济的大幅波动给消费者带来了极大的福利损失。宏观经济政策的目标之一就是通过消除这种经济波动,平滑消费者在不同时期的消费,提高消费者的福利水平。然而,经济波动给消费者带来的福利损失到底有多大?实际上,到目前为此,经济学家对经济波动的社会成本大小的看法仍然存在分歧。本文将从这种分歧出发,梳理国内外的相关研究文献,以便加深人们对经济周期波动及其福利成本的认识。
作者 庄子罐
出处 《经济学动态》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第11期92-95,共4页 Economic Perspectives
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献67

  • 1陈彦斌.中国经济增长与经济稳定:何者更为重要[J].管理世界,2005,21(7):16-21. 被引量:82
  • 2陈彦斌,周业安.中国商业周期的福利成本[J].世界经济,2006,29(2):11-19. 被引量:56
  • 3陈太明.中国经济周期的福利成本:1978-2004[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,24(1):22-30. 被引量:46
  • 4Dolmas, J., 1998, "Risk Preferences and the Welfare Cost of Business Cycles"[J], Reviews of Economic Dynamics, 1 (3) , pp.646-676.
  • 5Epaulard, A., and Pommeret, A., 2003, "Recursive Utility, Endogenous Growth and the Welfare Cost of Volatility"[J], Review of Economic Dynamics, 6 (3) , pp.672-684.
  • 6Epstein, L.G. and Stanley E. Zin, 1989, " Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption Growth and Asset Returns I, the Theoretical Framework"[J], Econometrica, 57, pp.937-969.
  • 7Epstein, L.G. and Stanley E. Zin, 1991, " Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns, an Empirical Analysis"[J], Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp.263-286.
  • 8Lucas, R.E.J., 1987, "Models of Business Cyeles"[M], Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  • 9Mehra, Rajnish, and Raaj, Sah, 2002, "Mood Fluctuations, Projection Bias, and Volatility of Equity Prices"[J], Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control, 26, pp.868-887.
  • 10Kocherlakota, 1990, “Disentangling the Coefficient of Relative Risk Aversion from the Elasticity of Intertemporal Substitution: an Irrelevance Result”[J], Journal of Finance, 45 ( 1 ) , pp.175-188.

共引文献255

同被引文献53

  • 1汪昌云,汪勇祥.资产定价理论:一个探索股权溢价之谜的视角[J].管理世界,2007,23(7):136-151. 被引量:14
  • 2Almeida, H. and T. Philippon (2007). "The Risk-Adjusted Cost of Financial Distress", Journal of Finance, 62, 2557-2586.
  • 3Arrow, K. J., M. L. Cropper, C. Gollier, B. Groom, G. M. Heal and R. G. Newell, et al. (2012). "How Should Benefits and Costs Be Discounted in an Intergenerational Context. The Views of an Expert Panel". Resource For the Future. Discussion paper No. RFF DP 12-53. Retrieved from http.//www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-12-53.pdf.
  • 4Atkeson, A. and C. Plelan (1994). "Reconsidering the Costs of Business Cycles with Incomplete Markets". In Fischer, S. and Rotem- berg, J. J. (Eds.), NBER blacroeeonomics Annual 1994 (pp.187-207). Cambridge. MIT Press.
  • 5Bansal, R. and A. Yaron (2004). "Risks for the Long Run. A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles", Journal of Finance, 59, 1481-1509.
  • 6Barro, J. and F. Ursua (2011). "Rare Macroeconomic Disasters". NBER Working Papers. No. 17328.
  • 7Barro, J. (2006). "Rare Disasters and Asset Markets in the Twentieth Century", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121,823-866.
  • 8Barro, J. (2009). "Rare Disasters, Asset Prices, and Welfare Costs", The American Economic Review, 99, 243-264.
  • 9Barro, J. and T. Jin (2011). "On the Size Distribution of Macroeconomic Disasters", Econometrica, 79, 1567-1589.
  • 10Barro, J. and F. Ursa (2008). "Maeroeconomie Crises since 1870", Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2008, 255-335.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部