期刊文献+

转喻的原型观 被引量:1

A Prototype-Theory-Based Approach to Metonymy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 转喻既是认识世界的工具,又是认识世界或范畴化的结果。从内涵及定义结构来看,不能以一套必要充分条件定义转喻这个概念范畴。从外延及指称结构来看,转喻与其它相邻范畴(本义语言、隐喻)的界限并非完全明晰。因此,转喻显示出原型效应。转喻的原型为基于空间关系的指称性转喻,且载体与目标关系为同一认知域的"整体—部分"关系,目标比载体更凸显。 Metonymy is both a tool and a result of understanding and categorizing the world.In terms of definitional structure on the intensional level,metonymy cannot be defined by means of a set of necessary and sufficient conditions.In terms of referential structure on the extensional level,the boundaries among metonymy,literal language and metaphor are not always determinate.Therefore,metonymy exhibits prototype effects.The prototype of metonymy is referential metonymy based on spatial relationship,in which vehicle and target are of whole-part relationship in the same domain,and target is more conceptually prominent than vehicle.
作者 孙亚
出处 《北京科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第3期18-23,共6页 Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 转喻 原型 指称性转喻 “整体—部分”关系 metonymy prototype referential metonymy whole-part relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Gibbs, R. W. Speaking and Thinking with Metonymy [A]. In Panther, K., & Radden, G. (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999: 61-76.
  • 2Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. Metaphors We Live by [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 3Panther, K., & Radden, G. Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999.
  • 4Barcelona, A. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gmyter, 2000.
  • 5Dirven, R., & Porings, R. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast [C]. Berlin/New York: Mouhon de Gruyter, 2002.
  • 6Panther, K., & Thornburg,L.L. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003.
  • 7Kosecki, K. Perspectives on Metonymy [C]. Berlin: Peter Lang, 2007.
  • 8徐盛桓.转喻与分类逻辑[J].外语教学与研究,2008,40(2):93-99. 被引量:52
  • 9徐盛桓.转喻语句与真值条件——“转喻与逻辑”研究之三[J].外语教学与研究,2009,41(1):3-10. 被引量:3
  • 10张辉 ,孙明智 .概念转喻的本质、分类和认知运作机制[J].外语与外语教学,2005(3):1-6. 被引量:146

二级参考文献262

共引文献515

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部