期刊文献+

民用航空动力技术风险评估的量化方法 被引量:3

Quantity method of technical risk assessment for civil aero-engine
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过层次分析法和质量功能展开,将用户对先进民用航空发动机的总需求逐层展开到具体技术并求得其权重,同时采用技术成熟度等级对各具体技术的风险水平进行量化,综合具体技术的权重和风险值计算得到整个发动机的总技术风险.该方法不仅可以评估整机系统,对其部件系统同样有效.以某型在研涡扇发动机的涡轮部件为例,应用该方法对其进行数值模拟,得到了定量的技术风险评估结果. The weight of specific technology was obtained by using analytic hierarchy process and quality function development,which can develop customer's aggregate demand for the advance civil aero-engine layer by layer until specific technology,the risk level of specific technology was quantified by the technology readiness levels,and then,the overall risk of the whole aero-engine could be calculated by integrated analysis of weight and risk of specific technology.This method can assess the whole aero-engine as well as its component system.As an example,the quantitative risk result is obtained through simulation of the turbine component of an under-researched turbofan-engine.
出处 《航空动力学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期2403-2408,共6页 Journal of Aerospace Power
关键词 民用航空发动机 技术风险评估 层次分析法 质量功能展开 技术成熟度等级 civil aero-engine; technical risk assessment; analytic hierarchy process; quality function development; technology readiness levels;
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Smith J, Egglestone G, Farr P, et al. Technical risk assessment of Australian defence projects[R]. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, ADA430722, 2005-15, 2005.
  • 2Graettinger C P, Garcia Miller S, Siviy J, et al. Using the tehnology readiness levels scale to support technology management in the DOD's ATD/STO environments: a findings and recommendations report conducted for army CECOM[R]. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute,CMU/SEI-2002 SR 027,2002.
  • 3Ruth B A,German B J, Mavris D N. Adaptive selection of engine technology solution sets from a large combinatorial space[R]. Salt Lake City, UT:the 2001 AIAA/ASME/ SAE Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA 2001-3208,2001.
  • 4Roth B A, Mavris D N, Macsotai N I, Adaptive selection of aircraft engine technologies in the presence of risk [J]. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power,Z004,126(1):40 -44.
  • 5Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: McGraw Hill Company, 1980.
  • 6Saaty T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Intertaces, 1994,24(6): 19-43.
  • 7许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1988.160-165.
  • 8XIONG Wei, XIA Jun. The improvement of telecom service quality based on QFD [C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on QFD. Williamsburg,Virginia, USA:[s. n.],2007:240- 248.
  • 9Verma D,Chilakapati R,Blanchard B. Quality function deployment (QFD) :integration of logistics requirements into mainstream system design and development proeess[C]// Proceedings Annual Symposium, Society of Logistics Engineers. San Antonio, TX:[s. n.],1995.
  • 10Mankins J C. Technology readiness levels: white paper [R]. Office of Space Access and Technology, NASA, 1995.

共引文献546

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部