期刊文献+

稳定性二氧化氯脱硫技术研究 被引量:2

Study on removal of SO_2 by stabilized chlorine dioxide
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用稳定性二氧化氯溶液为氧化吸收液,在填料塔中进行了气液逆流吸收操作,以盐酸副玫瑰苯胺分光光度法作为分析手段,研究了各操作因素对SO2去除率的影响。结果表明,当填料高度大于20 cm、二氧化氯质量浓度为0.6 g/L、pH为3.47、液气比为46.668时,SO2去除率达到99.95%以上;各操作因素中,二氧化氯的浓度对SO2去除率影响最为显著,当其质量浓度从1.0 g/L降低到0.2 g/L时,SO2去除率从99.97%降低到99.91%;SO2去除率受吸收液的pH、填料高度和液气比的影响较小。氧化吸收后的产物主要含HC l和H2SO4,易于回收。 With the stabilized chlorine dioxide solution as oxidation absorbent, the absorption of gas-liquid countercurrent operation is run in the packed tower. With spectrophotometry of pararosaniline hydrochloride as the analytical tool, the various operating factors on the SO2 removal rate are studied. The results show that when the packing height is more than 20 cm, the concentration of chlorine dioxide is about 0. 6 g/L, pH value is 3.47, the ratio of liquid to gas is 46. 668, the removal efficiency of sulfur dioxide could achieve more than 99. 95% ; Under the experimental conditions, the concentration of chlorine dioxide plays the most significant influence on the removal efficiency of sulfur dioxide,which would decrease to 99.91% from 99. 97% when its concentration decreases to 0. 2 g/L from 1.0 g/L;The sulfur dioxide removal efficiency is less affected by the pH value of absorption solution ,packing height and the liquid to gas ratio. The products after oxidized and absorbed include HC1 and H2SO4 mainly ,which can be recovered easily.
出处 《现代化工》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第11期55-57,共3页 Modern Chemical Industry
基金 国家自然科学基金(50774068)
关键词 二氧化氯 SO2 除硫 液气比 chlorine dioxide sulfur dioxide salfur removal liquid-gas ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

共引文献87

同被引文献41

  • 1王惠挺,郭瑞堂,高翔,骆仲泱,岑可法.利用NaClO_2/CaCO_3浆液同时脱硫、脱硝的试验研究[J].热力发电,2013,42(1):41-44. 被引量:6
  • 2郭欣,郑楚光,贾小红,林钊,刘亚明.300MW煤粉锅炉烟气中汞形态分析的实验研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(6):185-188. 被引量:90
  • 3王智化,周俊虎,魏林生,温正城,岑可法.用臭氧氧化技术同时脱除锅炉烟气中NO_x及SO_2的试验研究[J].中国电机工程学报,2007,27(11):1-5. 被引量:109
  • 4王智化,周俊虎,温正城,张彦威,岑可法.利用臭氧同时脱硫脱硝过程中NO的氧化机理研究[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2007,41(5):765-769. 被引量:60
  • 5Pudasainee D, Kim J, Yoon Y. Oxidation, reemission and mass distribution of mercury in bituminous coal-fired power plants with SCR, CS-ESP and wet FGD[J]. Fuel, 2012, 93(3): 312-318.
  • 6Chien T W, Hsin Chu. Removal of SO2 and NO from flue gas by wet scrubbing using an aqueous NaClO2 solution [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 80(1-3): 43-57.
  • 7Liu Y X, Zhang J, Sheng C D, et al. Simultaneous removal of NO and SO2 from coal-fired flue gas by UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation process[J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 162(3): 1006-1011.
  • 8Mok Young Sun, Lee Heon-Ju. Removal of sulfur dioxide andnitrogen oxides by using ozone injection and absorption-reduction technique[J] . Fuel Processing Technology, 2006, 87(7): 591-597.
  • 9Tan Yewen, Mortazavi R, Bureau B, et al. An investigation of mercury distribution and speciation during coal combustion[J]. Fuel, 2004, 83(16): 2229-2236.
  • 10Deshwal B R, Jin D S, Lee S H, et al. Removal of NO from flue gas by aqueous chlorine-dioxide scrubbing solution in a lab-scale bubbling reactor[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2008, 150(3): 649-655.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部