试论村上春树否定历史、开脱日本战争责任的故意和逻辑方法

Haruki Murakami's Logic in His Denial of History and Japan's War Responsibility

村上在"奥姆事件"之后,虽标榜要以社会责任感探究日本回避责任型社会体制缺陷的问题,但是,他在对有关"诺门坎事件"和"沙林暴力事件"的思考中,却与这美丽的口号产生了严重的偏离。村上的历史观与美化日本侵略战争的皇国史观如出一辙,他背离了一个有良知、有正义感的作家所应背负的使命感。

After the Aum event, Murakami pointed to the need to inquire into the flaw of the social system with regard to the Japanese evasion of war responsibility. However, he actually deviated from this attitude when thinking about the ＂ Nomonghan campaign ＂ and the ＂ satin nenrotoxin compound violence＂ His logic and conception of history are the same as that of ＂joining without a medium＂ used in his novel Kafka on the Shore.