期刊文献+

不同年龄冠心病患者经桡动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性对比分析 被引量:7

Comparison of outcomes after transradial intervention in patients of different age groups
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析不同年龄组冠心病患者经桡动脉介入治疗(TRI)住院期间安全性和有效性及不良事件的预测因素。方法研究对象为我院2004年5月至2009年5月接受TRI的16293例冠心病患者,分析不同年龄组,中青年(〈65岁)、老年(65~79岁)、老老年(≥80岁)患者住院期间临床后果,多因素分析住院期间主要不良心脏事件(包括死亡、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建)的影响因素。结果中青年、老年、老老年组造影成功率分别为97.5%,97.4%,98.1%(P〉0.05),而操作并发症随年龄增加而增加(0.8%、1.2%、4.O%,P〈0.01)。中青年、老年、老老年组之间住院期间主要不良心脏事件发生率(分别为1.3%,2.2%,7.5%,P〈0.01)和病死率(0.1%、0.3%、2.9%,P〈0.01)随年龄增加而增加,植入药物涂层支架比例逐渐下降(92.0%、89.6%、57.8%,P〈0.01)。多因素分析表明住院期间主要不良心脏事件的独立预测因素[OR(95%可信区间)]为年龄≥80岁[6.26(3.33~11.74);P〈0.01],既往心肌梗死[2.19(1.66~2.88);P〈0.01]、左主干病变[2.02(1.04~3.91);P=0.04]、年龄65~79岁[1.83(1.37~2.43);P〈0.01]、支架数[1.31(1.15~1.50);P〈0.01]、支架总长度[1.01(1.00~1.02);P=0.03]、植入药物涂层支架[0.59(0.39~0.89);P=0.01]。结论中青年、老年患者经桡动脉介入治疗住院期间具有良好的临床疗效,而年龄/〉80岁患者住院期间不良事件危险度明显增加。 Objective To compare the in-hospital clinical outcome of patients with coronary artery disease in different age groups [ 〈 65 years (younger), 60 to 79 years (older), and ≥ 80 years (octogenarians) ] underwent transradial intervention (TRI) so asto analyze the predictors of adverse events. Method From May 2004 to May 2009, a total of 16 293 patients underwent transradial intervention at our institution. The in- hospital outcome for patients in different age groups after TRI was investigated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determinate the predictors of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events(MACE) (composed of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization). Results Angiographic success rates were not different (97.5%, 97.4%, 98. 1%, P 〉 0. 05) between 3 groups. However, the rates of procedureal complications became progressively higher with age group (O. 8 %, 1.2 % ,4.0%, P 〈 0. 01 ). In-hospital MACE ( 1.3 % vs 2. 2% vs 7. 5 %, P 〈 0. 01 ) and mortality (0. 1% vs 0. 3% vs 2.9%, P 〈0. 01 ) increased incrementally with age group. Aad it was associated with a significant decrement of DES ( 92. 0% , 89. 6% , 57.3% , P 〈 0. 01 ) . The following characteristics were identified as independent multivariate predictors of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events : age≥80 ( OR6.26, 95%CI: 3.33 to 11.74; P〈0.01), prior myocardial infarction(OR 2. 19, 95%CI:1.66 to 2. 88; P〈 0.01), left main lesion(OR 2.02, 95% CI: 1.04 to 3.91; P =0.04), age of 65 to 79(OR 1.83, 95% CI: 1.37 to 2. 43 ; P 〈 0. 01 ), number of implanted stents ( OR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.15 to 1.50 ; P 〈 0. 01 ), total stented length( OR 1.01, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.02 ; P = 0. 03), and use of DES ( OR 0.59, 95% CI: 0.39 to 0. 89 ; P = 0. 01 ). Conclusions The younger and older patients undergoing TRI have a more favorable in-hospital outcome. However the octogenarians has a substantially higher risk of in-hospital MACE.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第40期2852-2855,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 支架 年龄 不良心脏事件 Coronary disease Stents Age Major adverse cardiac events
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Achenbach S,Ropers D,Kallert L,et al.Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2008,72:629-635.
  • 2Jolly SS,Amlani S,Hamon M,et al.Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events:a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized trials.Am Heart J,2009,157:132-140.
  • 3Koutouzis M,Matejka G,Olivecrona G,et al.Radial vs.femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.Cardiovasc Revasc Med,2010,11:79-83.
  • 4Ellis SG,Vandormael MG,Cowley MJ,et al.Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with anginplasty for muhivessel coronary disease:implications for patients selection:mltivessel angioplasty prognosis study group.Circulation,1990,91:1959-1965.
  • 5Campeau L.Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn,1989,16:3-7.
  • 6Brandes RP,Fleming I,Busse R.Endothelial aging.Cardiovasc Res,2005,66:286 -294.
  • 7Klein LW,Block P,Brindis RG,et al.ACC-NCDR Registry.Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry:development of a nomogram predictive of in-hospital mortality.J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40:394-402.
  • 8Dynina O,Vakili BA,Slater JN,et al.In-hospital outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions in the very elderly.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv,2003,58:351-357.
  • 9Niebauer J,Sixt S,Zhang F,et al.Contemporary outcome of cardiac catheterizations in 1085 consecutive octogenarians.Int J Cardiol,2004,93:225-230.
  • 10Spaulding C,Daemen J,Boersma E,et al.A pooled analysis of data comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents.N Engl J Med,2007,356:989-997.

同被引文献53

引证文献7

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部