期刊文献+

暂时冠桥树脂材料边缘适合性的体外研究

In vitro Marginal Adaptation of Single Crowns Fabricated from Several Provisional Resins
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较5种暂时冠桥修复树脂材料直接法制作暂时冠的边缘适合性。方法:使用超硬石膏翻制标准铝制基牙代型40个,在石膏代型上制作标准后牙蜡型,随机分为5组,硅橡胶印模材料制取阴模型腔,去除蜡型后,分别使用5种暂时修复树脂材料(Protemp 3 Garant、Luxatemp、Luxatemp Solar、QuickResin和Curefast)直接法制作树脂单冠。暂时冠在石膏代型上完全就位后,SEM下测量树脂冠边缘与石膏代型边缘之间的边缘间隙。结果:单因素方差分析结果显示各材料组之间的边缘间隙存在显著性差异(P<0.05),Protemp 3 Garant和Luxatemp两种材料的边缘间隙显著小于Luxatemp Solar、QuickResin和Curefast(P<0.05),QuickResin材料的暂时冠具有最大的边缘间隙。结论:化学固化复合树脂材料暂时冠边缘适合性优于PMMA类树脂材料;双固化bis-acryl复合树脂和PMMA类树脂材料边缘适合性较差,不推荐临床使用。 Objective:To compare the marginal adaptation of single crown fabricated from 5provisional resin materials.Methods:40 gypsum dies were duplicated from a standard aluminum die.Wax patterns with similar molar shape were then made on all gypsum dies.The gypsum die/wax pattern assemblies were divided randomly into 5 experimental groups.A direct technique was used to fabricate 40 provisional resinous crowns with 5materials:Protemp 3 Garant,Luxatemp,Luxatemp Solar,Quick Resin and Curefast.The provisional crowns were fabricated on these gypsum dies with a silicone rubber impression as a matrix.Marginal discrepancy of provisional crowns was measured under SEM observation after provisional crowns were seated on gypsum dies.Results:One-way ANOVA showed that significant difference was observed among 5experimental groups(P〈0.05).The marginal discrepancies of Protemp 3 Garant and Luxatemp were significantly smaller than Luxatemp Solar,QuickResin and Curefast(P〈0.05).QuickResin exhibited the most marginal discrepancies.Conclusion:Provisional crowns made from chemical-cured provisonal composite materials produced better marginal adaptation compared with PMMA provisional materials.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第5期643-645,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 暂时修复材料 边缘适合性 边缘间隙 Provisional restorative material Marginal adaptation Marginal discrepancy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Kim SH, Watts DC. Polymerization shrinkage--strain kinetics of temporary crown and bridge materials [J]. Dent Mater, 2004, 20(1) : 88 -95.
  • 2Ogawa T, Aizawa S, Tanaka M, et al. Effect of water temperature on the fit of provisional crown margins during polymerization [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 82(6) : 658-661.
  • 3Rosenstiel SF, I.and MF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics [M]. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2000, 391-- 394.
  • 4Nejatidanesh F, Lotfi HR, Savabi O. Marginal accuracy of interim restorations fabricated from four interim autopolymerizing resins [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2006, 95(5) : 364-367.
  • 5Koumjian JH, Holmes JB. Marginal accuracy of provisional restorative materials [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1990, 63(6) ; 639-642.
  • 6Young HM, Smith CT, Morton D. Comparative in vitro evaluation of two provisional restorative materials [J].J Prosthet Dent, 2001, 85(2) : 129-132.
  • 7Lepe X, Bales DJ, Johnson GH. Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements [J]. J Prosthct Dent, 1999, 81(4) : 469-475.
  • 8Givens EJ Jr, Neiva G, Yaman P, et al. Marginal Adaptation and Color Stability of Four Provisional Materials [J]. J Prosthodont, 2008, 17(2) : 97-101.
  • 9Dubois RJ, Kyriakakis P, Weiner S, et al. Effects of occlusal loading and thermocycling on the marginal gaps of light--polymerized and autopolymerized resin provisional crowns [J].J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 82(2): 161-166.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部