期刊文献+

我国企业IT投资成长模式及中美比较研究 被引量:1

IT Investment Growth Model of Chinese Enterprises and Comparison between USA and China
原文传递
导出
摘要 为全面探索我国企业IT投资成长模式及中美差异,为我国政府制定信息化政策提供参考依据。以IT产品价格变化为技术进步的替代变量,结合技术扩散模型,分析我国294家企业1982-2008年IS建设历史数据。结果表明:我国企业IT投资受到技术进步的显著影响,与美国相比其年增长率较高,"S"型曲线极值出现得较晚,后发优势、信息技术进步和经济的高速增长是造成中美差异的主要原因。 The paper explores the growth model of information technology (IT) investment of Chinese enterprises and compares with the USA. It provides references for the government making informationization policies. It uses IT product price changes instead of technical progress, analyzes 294 enterprises' data of information systems (IS) construction in China combined with technology diffusion model. It finds the IT investment growth of Chinese enterprises is impacted by technology progress. Compared with the USA, its annual growth rate higher, the extreme value of S-shaped curve also appeared later. The main reasons of the differences are advantage of backwardness, the rapid economic growth and the development of IT.
出处 《图书情报工作》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第22期75-79,共5页 Library and Information Service
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"中国企业信息系统成长的宏观与微观过程理论与实证研究"(项目编号:70471014) 吉林大学"985工程"研究生创新基金项目"东北地区企业信息系统成长的宏观与微观过程理论与实证研究"(项目编号:20081212)研究成果之一
关键词 IT投资 成长模式 技术进步 技术扩散 信息系统 IT investment growth model technology progress technology diffusion information system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献2

共引文献23

同被引文献23

  • 1李治堂.信息技术投资“生产率悖论”研究及其最新进展[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26(9):2-7. 被引量:18
  • 2Porter M E, Millar V E. How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage [J]. Harvard Business Review, 1985, 65(4):149-160.
  • 3Clemons E K. Information systems for sustainable competitive advantage [J]. Information and Management, 1986, 11(3):131-136.
  • 4Banker R D, Kauffman R J, Morey R C. Measuring gains in operational efficiency from information technology: A study of the position deployment at Hardee's Inc [J]. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1990, 7(2):29-54.
  • 5Sager M. Competitive Information Systems in Australian Retail Banking [J]. Information and Management, 1988, 15(1): 59-67.
  • 6Warner T N. Information Technology as a Competitive Burden [J]. Sloan Management Review, 1987, 29(1): 55-61.
  • 7Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending [J]. Management Science, 1996, 42(4):541-558.
  • 8Bharadwaj A S. A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2000, 24(1):169-196.
  • 9Henderson J C, Venkatraman N. Strategic alignment: a model for organizational transformation through information technology management [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992:97-117.
  • 10Chan Y E, Huff S L, Barclay D W, et al. Business Strategic Orientation, Information Systems Strategic Orientation, and Strategic Alignment [J]. Information Systems Research, 1997, 8(2):125-147.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部