期刊文献+

职业体育联盟准入限制的反垄断考察--基于美国反垄断司法实践 被引量:18

Antitrust Analysis of Membership Restrictions of Professional Sports Leagues——Based on U.S.Antitrust Judicial Experience
下载PDF
导出
摘要 职业体育反垄断一直以来都是一个十分复杂而又区别于其他领域反垄断实践的特殊领域。职业体育联盟的准入限制规则一直以来都受到反垄断法的严格审查。然而由于职业体育的特殊性,使得反垄断法对职业体育联盟准入限制规则的调整变得十分复杂。主要采用案例分析、比较分析和逻辑分析等方法,对职业体育联盟适用"关键设施"理论进行了论证,并就附属性限制原则适用于对职业体育联盟准入限制的反垄断分析进行了深入的考察。最后,从竞赛产品质量、联盟的管理、俱乐部特许专营权市场以及"搭便车"等方面对职业体育联盟准入限制作为附属性限制的合理性进行了证明。 Professional sports antitrust have long been a complicated and different from other industries.Antitrust laws should not treat them any differently than firms in other industries.Membership restrictions have always been antitrust scrutiny.Because of the special nature of professional sports,it has becomes very complicated to adjust membership restrictions.This paper,using the case analysis,comparative analysis and logic analysis,discusses the leagues that should be deemed to be essential facilities,explores the ancillary restraints,and defines the types of membership rules which the leagues should be permitted to adopt.Finally,a brief evidence analysis to membership restrictions as reasonable ancillary restraints is made from the products quality,leagues management,franchises and free-rider.The main purpose is to provide a new perspective to adjust professional sports membership restrictions.
作者 姜熙 谭小勇
出处 《体育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第11期42-49,73,共9页 China Sport Science
基金 上海高校优青科研基金项目资助(szf09005) 上海市教委科研创新项目资助(10YS223)
关键词 职业体育联盟 准入限制 反垄断 关键设施 附属性限制 professional sports sports leagues membership restrictions antitrust essential facilities ancillary restraints
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1姜熙,谭小勇.美国职业棒球反垄断豁免制度的历史演进——基于案例分析[J].天津体育学院学报,2010,25(2):113-117. 被引量:23
  • 2姜熙,谭小勇.美国职业体育反垄断劳工豁免制度研究[J].中国体育科技,2010,46(5):93-100. 被引量:13
  • 3许光铺.联邦反托拉斯政策[M].北京:法律出版社,2009:214-250.
  • 4ADAM TEICHER. NFL teams walk when money talks[N]. The Kansas City Star, 1995-11-12.
  • 5DICK PATRICK. Franchise moves might be the next agent of change[N] USA Today, 1994- 10- 21.
  • 6DICK PATRICK. Franchise moves might be the next agent of change[N]. USA Today,1994- 10-22.
  • 7DONALD I. BAKER. Compulsory access to network joint ven tures under the sherman act- rules or roulette? [J]. Utah Law Rev, 1993, 1 (1) : 1071-1077.
  • 8GAlL KERR, JEFF LEGWOLD. The deal: no new taxes[N]. Tennessean, 1995-10-06.
  • 9HERBERT HOVENKAMP. Exclusive joint ventures and anti- trust policy[J]. Columbia Business Law Rev, 1995, (1) : 70.
  • 10JOSEP F BRODLEY. Analyzing joint ventures with foreign partners [J]. Antitrust Law J, 1984, (1) : 73-75.

二级参考文献33

  • 1全国人民代表大会常务委员会.中华人民共和国反垄断法[Z].北京:全国人民代表大会常务委员会,2007,8.
  • 2Joseph J McMahon.A History and Analysis of Baseball's Three Antitrust Exemptions[J].Villanova Sports&Entertainment Law Forum,1995,3:259-261.
  • 3Comment.Monophony in Manpower:Organized Baseball Meets the Antitrust Laws[Z].YALE L.J,1953,62:576-586.
  • 4Richard B.Blackwell,Baseball's Antitrust Exemption and the Reserve System:Reappraisal of an Anachronism[J].WM.&MARY L.REV,1971,12:859-861.
  • 5Comment.Organized Baseball and the Law[Z].YALE L.J,1937,46:1386-1387.
  • 6E Thomas Sullivan,Herbert Hovenkamp.Antitrust Low,Policy and Procedure[M].1994,33.
  • 7National League of Professional Baseball Clubs v.Federal Baseball Club,Inc[Z].D.C.Cir,1920,681,682,683.
  • 8Federal Baseball Club,Inc.v.National League of Professional Baseball Clubs[Z].U.S,1922,200,208.
  • 9Toolson v.New York Yankees,Inc[Z].Toolson v,1952,198.
  • 10Haywood v.NBA[Z].Haywood v,1971,1204.

共引文献29

同被引文献249

引证文献18

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部