三监“叛周”原因考

Verification of the Reason for"Three Supervisors’ Mutiny against ZhouDynasty"

通过对《尚书》中"百工"及"百官"词意的重新考释,结合《逸周书》、《竹书纪年》、《诗经》中的相关内容及"三监之地"的现代考古结果,考察西周初年的三监"叛周"事件,"三叔"其实并未武装叛乱。武王伐纣时,西周已劫夺走了殷商的核心技术人才和青铜工具,周公任冢宰又要强征邶国及庶邦百工,使"三监之地"失去生存及发展条件,这才是"三叔"、武庚和其他庶邦共同反对周公的真正原因。

A new semantic study of＂Bai Gong＂and＂Bai Guan＂in Book of History,with relevant citations and explana-tions from Yi Zhou Shu,the bamboo annals,and Book of Songs as well as archaeological studies of the very place, makes a historical judgment,contrary to previous ones,on the causes of＂three supervisors’mutiny against early Zhou Dynasty＂：firstly,the＂three Uncles＂were not mutineers;secondly,the real causes for Wu Geng,other vassal states and them against Zhou Gong are his plunders of essential technicians and bronze from Yin Shang and his control of craftsmen in West Zhou and vassal states when as personnel manager,deprived their places of survival and development