摘要
目的通过对血液滤过亚低温与传统亚低温疗法效果的比较,探讨其对重症脑损伤患者血中肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α、白介素(IL)-18及细胞间黏附分子(ICAM)-1水平及患者预后的影响。方法选择重型脑损伤患者32例,随机分为2组,血液滤过组16例,传统降温组16例。伤后6h血液滤过组开始采用血液滤过体外循环降温,传统降温组入院后立即采用头部冰帽及背部冰毯物理降温,2组病例均每小时监测1次直肠温度变化,并于治疗前和治疗后9h采集动脉血检测炎症介质的浓度。进行治疗后2组恢复良好率的比较。结果血液滤过组治疗后9h较治疗前3种炎症介质均明显降低,分别为TNF-α〔(23.85±1.62)vs(52.35±0.72)μmol/L,P<0.05〕,IL-18〔(7.36±3.29)vs(15.20±3.66)μmol/L,P<0.05〕和ICAM-1〔(6.56±2.38)vs(12.58±3.68)μmol/L,P<0.05〕;且明显低于传统降温组,分别为TNF-α〔(23.85±1.62)vs(53.85±1.32)μmol/L,P<0.05〕,IL-18〔(7.36±3.29)vs(12.35±4.12)μmol/L,P<0.05〕和ICAM-1〔(6.56±2.38)vs(12.37±2.61)μmol/L,P<0.05〕。血液滤过组恢复良好率明显高于传统降温组(56.25%vs25.00%,P<0.05)。结论血液滤过亚低温方法用于脑损伤后的治疗,能清除血中的炎症介质TNF-α、IL-18、ICAM-1,提高患者的恢复良好率,改善患者的预后。
Objective To investigate the impact of hemofihration mild hypothermia on the blood level of tumor necro- sis factor(TNF)-α,interleukin(IL)-18,intercellular adhesion molecular(ICAM)-1 and on the prognosis in the patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods Eligible 32 patients with severe traumatic brain injury were randomly divided into two groups :hemofiltration mild hypothermia group and traditional mild hypothermia group (n = 16 each). The patients were cooled by hemofihration during extracorporeal circulation 6 hours after injury in hemofiltration mild hypothermia group, and the pa- tients were physically cooled by the head ice caps and back ice blanket immediately when they were admitted to hospital in tra- ditional mild hypothermia group. The rectal temperatures were monitored once a hour after treatment, and the arterial blood concentration of inflammatory mediators (TNF-α, IL-18 and ICAM-1 ) were detected by ELISA method before treatment and 9 hours after treatment respectively in all the patients of two groups. The good recovery rates of two groups were compared. Resuits Compared with pretreatment,TNF-α[(23.85 ±1.62) vs( 52.35 ±0.72) μmol/L],IL-18[ (7.36±3.29) vs (15.20 ±3.66) μmol/L] and ICAM-1[ (6.56 +2.38) vs (12.58 ±3.68) μmol/L3 significantly decreased (all P〈0.05) in hemofihration mild hypothermia group, and compared with traditional mild hypothermia group , TNF-α [ (23.85 ± 1.62 ) vs (53.85 ±1.32) μmol/L],IL-18(7.36±3.29) vs (12.35 ±4. 12 ) μmol/L]and ICAM-1[(6.56±2.38) vs (12.37±2. 61 ) μmol/L] 9 hours after treatment significantly decreased as well ( all P 〈 0. 05 ) in hemofihration mild hypothermia group. The mentioned above inflammatory mediators had no obvious difference before and after treatment in traditional mild hy- pothermia group. The good recovery rate of hemofiltration mild hypothermia group was significantly higher than that in traditional mild hypothermia group (56. 25 % vs 25.00%, P 〈 0. 05 ). Conclusions Hemofihration mild hypothermia for the therapy of severe traumatic brain injury could eliminate the inflammatory mediators including TNF-α, IL-18 and ICAM-1, raise the good recovery rate and imorove orognosis of oatients.
出处
《中国临床研究》
CAS
2010年第11期960-962,共3页
Chinese Journal of Clinical Research
基金
沈阳市科学技术计划资助项目(1091172-1-04)
关键词
血液滤过
亚低温
脑损伤
炎症介质
Hemofiltration
Mild hypothermia
Brain injury
Inflammatory mediator